I just read a little about Evo Devo in an article from NOVA.
I tried to tell you that this is how you can get a multitude of different species from just a few genes back on a thread about a month ago.
No, and if you go back there, you will find that you were talking about a few switches turning things off and on that already existed. That is not what evo-devo is about, and I find it hard to believe that you don't know it.
You would have none of it. Now, that the same idea is repackaged by someone you respect, and calls it darwinian evolution, you buy it lock, stock and barrel.
No. You either don't understand what it is, or more likely, you realize your original claim was wrong, and you're trying to rewrite your history here.
This is intellectual dishonesty at its worst.
No kidding. Shame on you. Evolutionary development does not assert that speciation is the result of switching things off and on. It's about the modification of developmental genes to produce new functions and new taxa. "Reading a little" about a scientific theory is probably the most effective way of embarrassing yourself in a discussion like this.
Do this; investigate the way that homobox genes for limbs in vertebrates have been modified by mutations over time, and see why it's much, much more than flipping switches. If you want to oppose science, it would be best if you learned some more about it.
Edit: Start here:
Comparative analyses of Hox gene expression and regulation in teleost fish and tetrapods support the long-entrenched notion that the distal region of tetrapod limbs, containing the wrist, ankle and digits, is an evolutionary novelty. Data from fossils support the notion that the unique features of tetrapod limbs were assembled over evolutionary time in the paired fins of fish.
http://science.kennesaw.edu/~mdavi144/Publications_files/Davis2007b.pdf
Could save you some future embarrassment.