I'm using Strong's Greek and the King James translation. If you're looking around to find a definition of a Greek word to fit you doctrine, fine. Strong's doesn't define it as "imminent" and the King James doesn't translate it as "imminent."
Matt 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21, all are about Jesus gathering his elect from the earth.
Let us look at this passage again and perhaps you will finally address what I said::
"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. For the earnest expectation (apokaradokia) of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God...And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, that is, the redemption of our body" (Ro.8:18,19,23).
Here Paul is speaking of "the redemption of our body," an event that will happen when the Lord Jesus appears. The Greek word translated "earnest expectation" is "apokaradokia", and this word means "to watch with head erect or outstretched...to wait for in suspense" (Thayer's Greek English Lexicon).
Strong's defines the word, saying it is "from a comparative of G575 and a compound of κάρα kára (the head) and G1380 (in the sense of watching); intense anticipation:—earnest expectation."
Vine says that the word means "primarily 'a watching with outstretched head' (apo, 'from,' kara, 'the head,' and dokeo, 'to look, to watch'), signifies "strained expectancy, eager longing," the stretching forth of the head indicating an 'expectation' of something from a certain place, Rom. 8:19; Phil. 1:20" (Vine's Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words).
The same Greek word "was used in Greek writings to describe the alert watchman who peered into the darkness, eagerly looking for the first gleam of the distant beacon which would announce the capture of Troy." (Precept Austin).
So according to the Greek experts the word that Paul used in regard to the "redemption of our body" is a word that indicates that this event can take place at any time.
Paul would not be telling anyone to be eagerly looking for the appearance of the Lord Jesus if that appearance could not even take place until after the great tribulation is over!
So far you have seen these facts two times and you refuse to even attempt to address them. I can understand why all I hear are the crickets. After all, what could you possibly say?
You overlook something that is very important and that is when this event will happen:
"For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. Then shall the LORD go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle. And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east" (Zech.14:2-4).
This event will be the thing which causes great tribulation to be shortened:
"That For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened" (Mt.24:21-22).
Then immediately after the tribulation there will be signs in the sky (Mt.24:29) and here we will see what happens next:
"The sun and the moon shall be darkened, and the stars shall withdraw their shining. The LORD also shall roar out of Zion, and utter his voice from Jerusalem" (Joel 3:15:16).
So these verses are speaking of the Lord Jesus coming from Jerusalem:
"Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of the sky with power and great glory. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other" (Mt.24:29-31).
So this is not speaking of the catching up of the saints.
Remember, His disciples' question was only in regard to the signs of His coming and not to His coming itself (Mt.24:3).
"
Mark 13 is about gathering the elect from the four winds.
That's the rapture.
It says it happens after the tribulation. It's plain as day.
It's so plain and clear that only theologians could miss it.
Mark 13 is about gathering the elect from the four winds. That's the rapture. It says it happens after the tribulation. It's plain as day.
Mark 13 is about gathering the elect from the four winds. That's the rapture. It says it happens after the tribulation. It's plain as day. It's so plain and clear that only theologians could miss it. Seven posts later and we're still on one Greek word in one verse. You've shown no clear verses that say anything about the rapture happening before the tribulation. You wont, either, because they aren't there. There's no point in continuing. If your doctrine is resting on one word in one single verse, that doesn't even clearly mention anything like the rapture, and doesn't mention the tribulation, then you may want to think about that.
The danger with this pre-trib rapture is this. If the rapture were to happen at any second, the post-tribbers would be raptured. If the tribulation comes, and there is no rapture, then a lot of people are going to A. Say the Bible was wrong. Or B. Accept anti-christ as Christ. The pre-trib rapture is unbiblical, and it can easily lead to people abandoning Christianity in the last days.
Can we not see that the ones disappointed as the troubles increase, will go after the pre-tribbers with a vengeance.
LA
And you been gettin' yourself a head start, huh?
When we're all gone :listen: no we haven't been linger: abducted by aliens.The rapture debacle in a nutshell...Jesuit End Times Antichrist Deception...
Luk 17:34 I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
Luk 17:35 Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
Luk 17:36 Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
If its so plain then why did y0u not even attempt to answer what I said about it?
And why do you continue to run and hide from the fact that Paul used a word which indicates that the rapture could happen at any moment?
I answered your point about about Matthew 24:31 but you do not even attempt to answer my points. By the way, where in your timeline do you put the fulfillment of this prophect?:
"For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. Then shall the LORD go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle. And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east" (Zech.14:2-4).
When we're all gone :listen: no we haven't been linger: abducted by aliens.1 Thess. 4:16, 17 :dizzy:
Related:
Believe the Lie
If Matt. 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 aren't about the rapture of Christians, then there must be two raptures. You've not adressed this point at all. All you said was it's not about the rapture.
Further, I've pointed out that Strong's does not define "egizzio" as "imminent" and the KJV doesn't translate it that way, so your argument hinging on that is poor.
You seem to be the one that can't think straight.I'm using Strong's Greek and the King James translation. If you're looking around to find a definition of a Greek word to fit you doctrine, fine. Strong's doesn't define it as "imminent" and the King James doesn't translate it as "imminent."
Matt 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21, all are about Jesus gathering his elect from the earth. If you're asserting that these aren't verses about the rapture, then you're insane.