She clearly said at the beginning of her post that she wasn't talking about her husband.
Employers now? Never mind, I don't want to know.I'm willing to grant that a woman usually does not deserve a beating [at least, of course, not from their husbands, employers, etc.]
It's pretty much always unjust to rape someone.
Pretty much?
Employers now? Never mind, I don't want to know.
Sitamun said:This is very true, and to be honest why I've avoided posting on the forum for awhile. I've lately had to deal with a man who is an abusive alcoholic. Now, it's not a family member, nor my husband, but a man I unfortunately have to spend a large amount of time around due to my job.
Pretty much?
think: God's punishment in Isaiah
I'm unfamiliar with this. What are you talking about?
Isaiah 13:9 Behold, the day of the Lord cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it. 10 For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine. 11 And I will punish the world for their evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; and I will cause the arrogancy of the proud to cease, and will lay low the haughtiness of the terrible. 12 I will make a man more precious than fine gold; even a man than the golden wedge of Ophir. 13 Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger. 14 And it shall be as the chased roe, and as a sheep that no man taketh up: they shall every man turn to his own people, and flee every one into his own land. 15 Every one that is found shall be thrust through; and every one that is joined unto them shall fall by the sword. 16 Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished. |
It depends on how you understand rape. If you understand rape in such a way that it involves injustice in its very notion or description, then rape is intrinsically evil and never permissible.
if they were doing God's will, how could they be acting unjustly?
Everything that happens is according to God's will either a. by direct ordnance or b. by permission. Even our sins are foreknown and permitted by God.
Then "earn" is not an accurate term to use. Otherwise we are simply talking about cause and effect sans any responsibility or expectation by the victim for a possible negative outcome.
How do you understand rape?
St II-II said:I answer that, Rape, in the sense in which we speak of it now, is a species of lust: and sometimes it coincides with seduction; sometimes there is rape without seduction, and sometimes seduction without rape.
They coincide when a man employs force in order unlawfully to violate a virgin. This force is employed sometimes both towards the virgin and towards her father; and sometimes towards the father and not to the virgin, for instance if she allows herself to be taken away by force from her father's house. Again, the force employed in rape differs in another way, because sometimes a maid is taken away by force from her parents' house, and is forcibly violated: while sometimes, though taken away by force, she is not forcibly violated, but of her own consent, whether by act of fornication or by the act of marriage: for the conditions of rape remain no matter how force is employed. There is rape without seduction if a man abduct a widow or one who is not a virgin. Hence Pope Symmachus says [Ep. v ad Caesarium; Cf. can. Raptores xxxvi, qu. 2, "We abhor abductors whether of widows or of virgins on account of the heinousness of their crime."
There is seduction without rape when a man, without employing force, violates a virgin unlawfully
i started down this path yesterday with tam, but she was more interested in playing the fool than discussing it
like to come back to it with you, but later - got schoolwork to do
You should start a thread on it and link me to it when you do.
Sure it is.
Earn - 1.
to gain or get in return for one's labor (labor/actions)
also
3.
to acquire through merit
Merit - to procure, receive, obtain.
neither word, always means a positive, we can earn and merit negative consequences to our own decisions and actions.
Expectation of an event based on ones own actions or lack of action and decisions doesn't in any way affect that there are consequences for actions both good and bad.
Consequence, yes. If the consequence is not equitable to the action then it isn't earned. It's more cause and effect.
Consequence, yes. If the consequence is not equitable to the action then it isn't earned. It's more cause and effect.
con·se·quence
ˈkänsikwəns/
noun
noun: consequence; plural noun: consequences
1.
a result or effect of an action or condition.
I dont think you understand what consequence means.
For something to have an effect, it doesnt have to have a commensurate effect, just an effect.