There is such a thing as being so spiritually minded that you're no earthly good...Hey Drb,
Marhig is a spiritual Christian, not carnal Christian.
You can learn how to be spiritual from her.
Because in the Body of Christ, there is neither Jew nor Gentile, male nor female, slave nor free.So if you agree with those verses, how can you not believe that the gentiles who are circumcised of the heart are Jews inwardly?
There is such a thing as being so spiritually minded that you're no earthly good...
:think:
Because in the Body of Christ, there is neither Jew nor Gentile, male nor female, slave nor free.
For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. - Galatians 3:26-29 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians3:26-29&version=NKJV
Paul doesn't call us Christians "Jews" or "Israel." He calls us "Christ's."
Because in the Body of Christ, there is neither Jew nor Gentile, male nor female, slave nor free.
For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. - Galatians 3:26-29 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians3:26-29&version=NKJV
Paul doesn't call us Christians "Jews" or "Israel." He calls us "Christ's."
LOL, with all the scriptures you take out of context, your right, I didn't know what you will throw out there.
Did I say to deny scripture? No.So the scriptures about being a Jews inwardly is to be denied, as is the scripture about Abraham being the Gentiles father by faith?
I've been doing some reading and I stand corrected. The DBR does not make him the Christ but does fulfill what the Christ was to do to become our savior.
Thanks for challenging me.
I guess I should have said the good news is Jesus is the Christ and his DBR is what saves us.
Did I say to deny scripture? No.
You need to learn how to rightly divide the word of truth.
The 12 never once preached the "good news" of the cross prior to the cross. The "good news" of the cross was not preached until Paul started preaching it.
The descriptive "the Christ" is the issue of a chief aspect of all that said "Christ" - Jesus - had been anointed to come and do, to begin with, thus, "the Christ..."
Thus, in turn, Paul's use of the descriptive "Christ Jesus."
In the sense that...
Galatians 2:20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
Result - at least for those who ACTUALLY believe that ALONE?
2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
Romans 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus HATH made me free from the law of sin and death.
8:3 For what the law could NOT do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled IN US, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Where you greatly remain off is in your erroneous insistence on adding YOUR works to that.
Thus, it is no surprise you ended up missing the most important aspect of this "anointed" descriptive for "Jesus."
The issue of the Believer's...
Romans 3:24 Being justified FREELY by his grace TROUGH the redemption THAT IS IN Christ Jesus: 3:25 Whom God HATH set forth to be a propitiation through faith IN HIS blood, to declare HIS righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
That issue - through faith IN HIS blood - is nicely captured in that hymn's words beautiful words "God sees MY SAVIOUR AND THEN He sees me - IN THE BELOVED ACCEPTED and FREE!
http://www.hymntime.com/tch/htm/a/c/c/accepted.htm
Or as Paul went on to STRONGLY assert...
3:26 To declare, I say, at this time HIS righteousness: that (intent or purpuse) he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. 3:27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified BY FAITH WITHOUT the deeds of the law.
Because OF Rom. 5: 6-8 in EACH our STEAD.
Paul is NOT talking about the same aspects of the kingdom as Luke.Paul says that the kingdom of God comes not in word but in power, meaning the power of the Spirit in the heart. Many can read the Bible from back to front and quote it, but those who wrote it did so being inspired of God and they spoke with the power of the Spirit.
As I have explained far too many times, you will NOT find Peter preaching the GOOD NEWS of the cross anywhere before Paul. There is nowhere in Acts 1-8 that you will find the "preaching of the cross" per Paul (i.e., as GOOD NEWS).Yes the 12 didn't preach it before for a couple of reasons. 1, they only taught what Jesus told them to proclaim 2, he commanded them not to tell anyone he was the Christ.
I don't believe Paul was the first to proclaim it. Could you please point to where you believe he first proclaimed it?
As I have explained far too many times, you will NOT find Peter preaching the GOOD NEWS of the cross anywhere before Paul. There is nowhere in Acts 1-8 that you will find the "preaching of the cross" per Paul (i.e., as GOOD NEWS).
As I have explained far too many times, you will NOT find Peter preaching the GOOD NEWS of the cross anywhere before Paul. There is nowhere in Acts 1-8 that you will find the "preaching of the cross" per Paul (i.e., as GOOD NEWS).
Right after you show where Peter preached the good news of the CROSS anywhere in Acts 1-8.Could you please point to where Paul first preached the good news.
Right after you show where Peter preached the good news of the CROSS anywhere in Acts 1-8.
As I have explained far too many times, you will NOT find Peter preaching the GOOD NEWS of the cross anywhere before Paul.
You don't know what the good new of the cross is?I was hoping to see what you consider preaching the good news so I can better point it out to you.
Once again, I will not attempt to address this until we can agree that Peter did not preach the good news of the cross in Act 1-8.Based on this quote, I was sure you could point to where Paul first preached the good news.
Right after you show where Peter preached the good news of the CROSS anywhere in Acts 1-8.