Preaching the Gospel !

Status
Not open for further replies.

glorydaz

Well-known member
No worries. you seem confused and need a nap. Maybe some vitamin C to perk you up.

BUT

Thanks for the opportunity you have amply provided.

who are you ( the reader,not just glorydaz) going to trust ? Christ, or calvinism

Poor baby. I didn't play the game the way you wanted. :chuckle:
 

glorydaz

Well-known member
EXACTLY - No puppet. no robots. AGAIN 1 Tim 2:4 ALL means ALL, The Holy Spirit is literate.
2 Peter 3:9 "Not willing that any should perish"

Amen

You can't come to the knowledge of the truth as long as you remain unwilling to be taught.
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned

No wonder you have a headache Daz.
However, getting back to the thread after you tantrum:-

For many years, Calvinism was at the heart of my belief system. It was unquestionable that man could not believe the gospel. He had a latent and inborn aversion to all things spiritual. Man, I held, was totally unable even to cry out for mercy.

The Fall had rendered him TOTALLY incapable of receiving its remedy.

This I deemed "sound doctrine." I elevated above the rabble of non-Calvinists all writers and theologians who championed it. Clark Pinnock describes a similar attitude he developed in the course of his faith-journey:

"Certainly most of the authors I was introduced to in those early days as theologically 'sound' were staunchly Calvinistic..


Any Christian who dissented from my soteriology was "an Arminian," regardless of whether that person subscribed to the issues of the Remonstrance (or even heard of them).

The main point at which I first questioned Calvinism was the nature of man in his sinful state. To question this point of the system is to question all of it. The last four points of Calvinism rest squarely upon the first, Total Inability. Once that dogma is removed, the entire superstructure crashes under its own weight.

On reading what the Bible ACTUALLY says, boy, it crashed BIG TIME.
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned
Total Inability is said to arise out of man's sinful state, his complete spiritual ruin in Eden. It has left him incapable of doing anything good, or even desiring it. Hence, he is disabled and can neither will nor obey any spiritual command - even the invitation to receive Christ. John Calvin sums this up in stark language:

"Let it stand, therefore, as an indubitable truth, which no engines can shake, that the mind of man is so entirely alienated from the righteousness of God, that he cannot conceive, desire, or design anything but what is wicked, distorted, foul, impure and iniquitous; that his heart is so thoroughly envenomed by sin, that it can breathe out nothing but corruption and rottenness; that if some men occasionally make a show of goodness, their mind is ever interwoven with hypocrisy and deceit, their soul inwardly bound with fetters of wickedness."

Note - hi-lighted in red; man is disabled by God to start with - according to Calvinism. How then can man have any responsibility for his sin which, was not his sin but that sin predestined upon him. Calvinism starts to crumble. And follows is a landslide.
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned
Two primary texts adduced to prove the doctrine of Original Sin (Rom. 5; 1 Cor. 15) say nothing about Total Inability.

Nowhere are we told that an invincible tendency to resist God was imparted to the race through the offense of one. If there were a place we would expect to find the doctrine, it would be in one of those passages dealing with the relationship between Adam and his descendants. But there is not a trace of such teaching there.


This is a serious difficulty. The Calvinist's entire system of soteriology is founded on the grand assumption that Adam was created morally impeccable. He lost perfection through sin and assumed a nature totally corrupted and alienated from God, a nature imparted to all mankind as a curse. But the Scriptural evidence for these contentions is, at best, scant.

A doctrine that forms such a colossal foundation-stone for the system should have unequivocal proof in the Bible. If a theology is based on an unproven philosophic assumption how can the rest of the system be trustworthy?

I have quoted 1 Tim 2:4 many times above.

I have quoted Charles Spurgeon - a respected theologian who slates Calvinism for changing the words of the Bible and denigrating the Holy Spirit as incompetent in saying what he actually means.

I have quoted 2 Peter 3:9 many times as well.

Why is the Calvinist blind to all these ? Perhaps blinded by God? Perhaps predestined never to see ALL of scripture ?
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned
How can God, who is perfectly just, "command all men everywhere to repent" (Acts 17:30), knowing the command is impossible to obey?
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned
Moses said, "Now what I am commanding you today is not too difficult for you or beyond your reach" (Deut. 30:11)

What of Total Inability here?
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned
Joshua urged the Israelites, "choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your forefathers served beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites, ...." (Josh. 24:15).

There is nothing in Joshua's entreaty that suggests the Israelites were all unable to choose.
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned
Luke writes, "With many other words he warned them; and he pleaded with them, 'Save yourselves from this corrupt generation'" (Acts 2:40).

Was Peter "pleading" with these people to do something they were impotent to do?
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned
Jesus himself did not believe in Total Inability. We read in Mark 4:11,12 that he spoke in parables as a judgment against the obstinate Jews. The purpose of parables was to keep his message from entering their ears, "otherwise they might turn and be forgiven" (v.12).

Had those stiff-necked people been allowed to hear the truth straight out, they might have turned to receive it.

But how? Calvinism tells us that no one can turn and receive the forgiveness of sins because of Total Inability
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned
In Romans 1, Paul writes of men who are "without excuse" because of the manifest presence of God in the creation. He says, "For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened" (Rom. 1:21).

Note what the text ACTUALLY says: became futile, not predestined that way from the beginning.
 

zzub

BANNED
Banned
SO MUCH more can be shown from scripture that refuted the calvinist corner stone of Total Depravity.

With the corner stone gone, the rest crumbles into worthless rubble.
 

Danoh

New member
Calvinism denies the conditional security of believers or the possibility of falling away from the faith as taught by the Bible (Matt. 24:13; Jn. 15:6; Acts 11:23; Acts 13:43; Acts 14:22; Rom. 8:13; Rom. 11:20-21; 1 Cor. 9:27; Heb. 2:1-3; Heb. 10:26-31; 2 Pet. 2:20-21);

It does appear you do assert "the conditional security of believers..."

Your cited passages for that being what's behind your mis-fire...

Here, I'll just break down the sense of that 1st passage you cited, in hopes of pointing out why you might do well to consider how you might also be off on those other passages you cited...

See the following Spoiler...

Spoiler

Matthew 24:13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

Context?

Daniel's prayer and answer in Daniel 9 - Israel's Prophesied Tribulation per THEIR Law...

Thus, why we read in...

Matthew 24:20 But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

THEIR Sabbath involves various traveling distance restrictions and limited means of travel.

Acts 1:11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven. 1:12 Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is from Jerusalem a sabbath day's journey.

That is the 12 Apostles and some of His disciples that is referring to...

Acts 1:21 Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 1:22 Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection.

Thus, that part in Matthew 24: 20's "But pray ye that your flight be not...on the sabbath day:"

That was one of the many ways that an Israelite was identified to other ethnicities as being God's chosen ethnicity - through THEIR keeping of THEIR Law: which identified them as being an ethnicity set apart by God above all other ethnicities of the Earth, given His purpose in His having divinely set them apart like that.

Exodus 19:4 Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself. 19:5 Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: 19:6 And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.

Their many persecutions throughout history being what - an ethnic one.

Due to this obvious, ethnic identity their commanded adherence to the Law of Moses given them by the God of their Fathers, results in, "in the SIGHT of the nations."

Tell me you do not see that identity throughout parts of your city every Friday.

Deuteronomy 4:6 Keep therefore and do them; for this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.

Romans 2:17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, 2:18 And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law; 2:19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, 2:20 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law.

Why THEIR many Tribulations (plural) throughout history, and THEIR Tribulation (singular)?

Romans 2:21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? 2:22 Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege? 2:23 Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God? 2:24 For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written. 2:25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

Even THAT salvation for that Israelite that endurerh unto the end of THEIR Tribulation is the issue of THEIR Physical deliverance from THEIR enemies.

James 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting. 1:2 My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; 1:3 Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience. 1:4 But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing.

That enduring unto the end is THEIR version under the Law of the Body's....

Romans 5:3 And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience; 5:4 And patience, experience; and experience, hope:

In contrast to those of THEIR nation who, having never believed end up...

Luke 21:26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. 21:27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.

In contrast to those are...

21:28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.

THAT is THEIR PHYSICAL salvation at the end.

Revelation 3:7 And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth; 3:8 I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name. 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. 3:11 Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.

Which is what this is...

Matthew 6:9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. 6:10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.

They are to focus on His Promised Return to THEM.

6:11 Give us this day our daily bread.

And prior to His return to THEM, He will PHYSICALLY deliver them THROUGH THEIR being able to endure unto the end of the trying of THEIR faith...

6:12 And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.

How long are they to concern themselves with this THEIR conditional forgiveness, and given what that was about, under THEIR Law, Daniel 9?

Until His return unto THEM.

How long is that?

Christ would suggest you ask THEIR Prophet Daniel...

Matthew 18:21 Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times? 18:22 Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven. 18:23 Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take account of his servants.

How long? Until He returns to THEM.

70 x 7 = 490 years, Daniel 9.

Matthew 6:13 And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.

Revelation 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. 3:11 Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.

Even that "quickly" there can be identified...

Matthew 24:22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved, but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.

In other words...

Romans 9:27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved: 9:28 For he will finish the work, and cut it short in righteousness: because a short work will the Lord make upon the earth.


And believe it or not, I touched on very, very little of just that much.

I have enjoyed your take on Calvinism, by the way - lots of great passages you brought great points out of. :thumb:

That aside, you would do well to get clear on...

Romans 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: 5:2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.

5:6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. 5:7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. 5:9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. 5:11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement.
 

Ask Mr. Religion

☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) &#9
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
zzub's Fifteen Minutes Are Up

zzub's Fifteen Minutes Are Up

This is a serious difficulty. The Calvinist's entire system of soteriology is founded on the grand assumption that Adam was created morally impeccable. He lost perfection through sin and assumed a nature totally corrupted and alienated from God, a nature imparted to all mankind as a curse. But the Scriptural evidence for these contentions is, at best, scant.

If you are going to steal from the guy, at least have the integrity to credit him:

http://www.auburn.edu/~allenkc/openhse/calvinism.html#Introduction :AMR:

If Adam was not any different, why would we need to be renewed in the image of God (Eph. 4:24, Col. 3:10)? When Paul tells us in what the image of God consisted and says we are renewed in that, it's not hard to see that when Adam begat a son in his own image, the image of God in which Adam had been created was not transmitted to Seth in its original glory (Gen. 5:1-3). As in your frequent snippets of others' efforts, there's a lot more assertion than demonstration in the article.

The decree of God establishes the free will of the moral creature: the ability to choose according to one's greatest inclinations at the moment they so choose. This is the liberty of spontaneity, not the libertarian free will claimed by the anti-Calvinist. In fact, had God not established free will in His decree there would be no free will at all.

Unfortunately, most complaints about free will are actually attempts to determine how God pulls off being wholly sovereign and holding man responsible. Scripture provides no special revelation about the how, only what is. When God shuts His mouth, so should we.

Some argue that God should be fair and impartial in the distribution of His grace. But what do the Scriptures say, “Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad... [Rebekah, their mother] was told, 'The older will serve the younger'” (Romans 9:11-12).

Those that would argue for "fairness" ignore the fact that throughout the scriptures we find God choosing over those that should, if things were “fair”, “impartial”—according to our feeble mortal reasoning—be chosen: Abel over Cain, Isaac over Ishmael, Jacob over Esau, and Judah over Joseph. In virtually every example of God's sovereignty in the scriptures we see Him choosing the unmerited over whom we would assume the merited. Yet, why then would some appeal to God that He should be "fair" in His dealings and "give" everyone something? The very breaths we draw are more than fallen man deserves from our Maker, yet we continue to demand He give us more, for after all, we are made in His image.

Persons have frequently used the image of God within us, the ability to know some things about God, to reason away God's kingship, preferring to cast Him as a “fair” God, where the standards of fairness are defined not by God, but by His creatures. Yet, as God has continually shown throughout the history of His recorded revelation, God's ways are not our ways, and He will do as He judges rightly, not making Himself subject to our own notions of how or why He should act in relationship to us.

Persons on the one hand, while claiming that “God is love”, forget that He is also a consuming fire. Any belief system which omits or under-emphasizes either of these or other truths will be a mutilated system, no matter how plausible it may sound to men. To formulate the doctrine by giving preeminence to, say, 1 John 4:8, is a classic unwarranted example of using a locus classicus to interpret the rest of Scripture.

Now some will no doubt claim that while God did not base His choice on anything that they had already done, that perhaps God based His choice on foreseen faith or works. Such foolish reasoning was anticipated by God, for Paul clearly writes that God announced His decision before the twins were born “in order that God's purpose in election might stand: not by works but by him who calls” (Romans:11-12). By denying that election was based on something that the twins had already done, Paul does not leave open any possibility that election was based on something that the twins would do. Instead, Paul explicitly denies that election was based on anything in them, but that it was based upon "him who calls" and "God's purpose."

Moreover, in Ephesians Paul relies on the same argument. God chose certain individuals not because of any foreseen faith or works in them, and not because of their decisions or merits, but election to salvation is based solely on his will (Ephesians 1:5), his pleasure (Ephesians 1:5), his grace (Ephesians 1:6-7), his purpose (Ephesians 1:11), and his plan (Ephesians 1:11). Again, the emphasis is that God's choice of individuals was done completely apart from anything foreseen in the individuals themselves. It was God “who saved us and called us to a holy calling, not because of our works but because of his own purpose and grace, which he gave us in Christ Jesus before the ages began,” (2 Timothy 1:9).

Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 1:27-30, “But God chose ... so that no one may boast before him. It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God—that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.” Paul speaks directly against any foolish reasoning that implies that only Christ is the object of election, and that whoever comes into Christ becomes God's elect. Read the passage again, "It is because of him"—i.e., because of God—that we are in Christ Jesus. God decides, not us, who becomes "in Christ," and God is the one who then puts us in Christ by His will and power.

Finally, from Ephesians 1 no matter how hard one may try, one cannot interpret “in him” (vs. 7, 11, 13) to mean that somehow we are able to place ourselves “in him” (Christ) anymore than one can claim they chose to be “in Adam”, the federal head of mankind, through whom all entered into sin (1 Cor. 15:22).

Some apparently find in their “freedom” a warrant to question everything more from the post-modern ethos of relative truth than a desire for Biblical accuracy. But where does it say that God owes anyone the stimulation and satisfaction of their mind? Did Job receive any direct answers? God tells me to love Him (that is, to obey Him) with my mind and at some level that has to mean subjecting my mind to His revealed Truth. No matter how much others mutilate the text, Paul meant what he said when he wrote (Romans 9:20) to the Romans concerning election, “who are you, O man, who answers back to God?


AMR
 

Ask Mr. Religion

☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) &#9
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Many who hear me speak know I am not a Calvinist. Those that don't find out real quick. It therefore comes a surprise that my favourite sermons are these of a Calvinist Theologian - Charles H Spurgeon.

3. It is quite certain that when we read that God will have all men to be saved it does not mean that he wills it with the force of a decree

I humbly submit that the Calvinist fraternity should read this whole sermon and be corrected on 'God's will', 'decree'. Be corrected by a Calvinist.
Would that those who appeal to Spurgeon for their anti-Calvinism, actually understand the man.

"It is quite certain that when we read that God will have all men to be saved it does not mean that He wills it with the force of a decree or a Divine purpose, for, if He did, then all men would be saved! He willed to make the world and the world was made—He does not so will the salvation of all men, for we know that all men will not be saved. Terrible as the Truth of God is, yet is it certain from Holy Writ that there are men who, in consequence of their sin and their rejection of the Savior, will go away into everlasting punishment where there shall be weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth. There will, at the last, be goats upon the left hand as well as sheep on the right. There will be tares to be burned as well as wheat to be garnered, chaff to be blown away as well as corn to be preserved. There will be a dreadful Hell as well as a glorious Heaven and there is no decree to the contrary."

As Spurgeon demonstrates in the sermon (1516), God’s wish (per Spurgeon) about man’s salvation is this—that men should be saved and come to the knowledge of the Truth of God. This is the preceptive will of God, the commands/precepts of God. What all should do.

The decree of God, as Spurgeon rightly observes is the decretive will of God, what will happen, what cannot not happen. As Spurgeon states, "And I know, too, that He has a people whom He will save, whom by His eternal love He has chosen and whom, by His eternal power, He will deliver."

Exactly how does one come to the knowledge of Truth described in this sermon? Spurgeon makes it clear: "that we are not to be regenerated by our own actions, but are regenerated by the Holy Spirit who comes to us".

All men,” they say, — “that is, some men”: as if the Holy Spirit could not have said “some men” if he had meant some men. “All men,” they say; “that is, some of all kinds of men”: as if the Lord could not have said “all kinds of men” if he had meant that.

May I humbly illuminate that the Holy spirt can, and does, say exactly what he means. What can be wrong with that?
As noted, you have overlooked the intent of Spurgeon in distinguishing between what God preceptively wills, versus what God volitionally wills by ordaining (decretive will). If you read Spurgeon more carefully, as he is very clear, we all wish for this or that. I wish I could lose ten pounds, my preceptive will. My doctor says I should do so (his preceptive will). But I will never lose ten pounds unless I volitionally will it and take the steps necessary (including the means my doctor may provide) to make it not not happen. Hence the distinctions between God's commands (precepts) and God's decree (ordaining).

As demonstrated, we Calvinists actually do read much about those who have come before us; and we actually try hard to understand what we have read. Those that think the saints of old have nothing to teach us or that we are somehow more endued with the Holy Spirit than they were in their time are but chronological snobs. :AMR:

You cannot appeal to Spurgeon for your oddities. You do the man's memory a disservice by your sad attempt to pit him against that which he held dear. I am confident you have not read the man's over 3500 sermons (I have), but merely borrow from the work of others (see my earlier post about your integrity) and cherry-pick.

If you want to read the man at his best and most perspicuous, try this:
http://thekingdomcollective.com/spurgeon/sermon/52/

You are operating outside your weight class and it shows.

AMR
 
Last edited:

beloved57

Well-known member
amr

"It is quite certain that when we read that God will have all men to be saved it does not mean that He wills it with the force of a decree or a Divine purpose,

Of course He wills it with decree and purpose, Hes God ! The word will here 1 Tim 2:4

Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

Its the geek word thelō and means:


  1. to will, have in mind, intend


    1. to be resolved or determined, to purpose


    2. to desire, to wish

      Furthermore even the thing the Almighty desireth that He doeth Job 23:13

      13 But he is in one mind, and who can turn him? and what his soul desireth, even that he doeth.

      for, if He did, then all men would be saved!

The all men He wills, desires to be saved shall be saved, thats all to it !

Anything less is below the Almighty and blasphemy !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top