Yeah, I wouldn't focus on that text message, it's just opinion.:liberals:
I haven't even discussed it. I was responding to the opening post.
Whatever Strzok's gut feeling was about the Mueller investigation prior to July of 2017 is irrelevant.
Do you agree?
I'm not trying to convince anybody of anything,
I post facts with my opinion.
I like my eggs on your face.
His opinion would be just his opinion.:liberals:
I haven't even discussed it. I was responding to the opening post.
Whatever Strzok's gut feeling was about the Mueller investigation prior to July of 2017 is irrelevant.
Do you agree?
If he had tweeted his 'opinions' instead of trying to cover them up, what would the left think of the info?Yeah, I wouldn't focus on that text message, it's just opinion.
His opinion would be just his opinion.
But the implication from several of his texts was that he was not concerned with any other "wrongs" being done other than by Trump.
And the further implication is that he would coddle anything brought up against Clinton and anyone else and leave it buried.
And his bias was obvious.
After reading the text messages that are available (who knows what the 'lost' messages may reveal), I don't blame them for firing Strzok.He "labeled Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent". Strzok's colleagues and a former Trump administration official said that Strzok had never shown any political bias. According to FBI guidelines, agents are allowed to have and express political opinions as individuals. Former FBI and DOJ officials told The Hill that it was not uncommon for agents like Strzok to hold political opinions and still conduct an impartial investigation."
Yet Mueller removed him anyway. The only place where there is no "there there" is in regard to Pater Strzok. "Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who said that he would only fire Mueller if there was actual cause under DOJ regulations, and that no such cause existed. Rosenstein also praised Mueller for removing Strzok from the Russian investigation itself."
After reading the text messages that are available (who knows what the 'lost' messages may reveal), I don't blame them for firing Strzok.
Right.Me either. I think it's a personal blunder on his part and he was rightly removed. This isn't evidence for some 'deep state' FBI conspiracy against Trump though either.
Nah, there's no deep state or shadow government. Everybody's on the up and up.Me either. I think it's a personal blunder on his part and he was rightly removed. This isn't evidence for some 'deep state' FBI conspiracy against Trump though either.
He "labeled Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent". Strzok's colleagues and a former Trump administration official said that Strzok had never shown any political bias. According to FBI guidelines, agents are allowed to have and express political opinions as individuals. Former FBI and DOJ officials told The Hill that it was not uncommon for agents like Strzok to hold political opinions and still conduct an impartial investigation."
Yet Mueller removed him anyway.
Nah, there's no deep state or shadow government. Everybody's on the up and up.
Me either. I think it's a personal blunder on his part and he was rightly removed. This isn't evidence for some 'deep state' FBI conspiracy against Trump though either.Nah, there's no deep state or shadow government. Everybody's on the up and up.
Nah, there's no deep state or shadow government. Everybody's on the up and up.
No, I think he's dumb and probably trying to look cool to his mistress. People above him pull all the strings. People you'll never hear about.Fine but are the Peter Strzok text messages evidence for this particular conspiracy theory? If you think so, explain how it is.
Funny thing is, you have no clue how ignorant you are. :chuckle:The "Yahbut defense":
"Yahbut, Hillary..." "Yahbut, the deep state..." "Yahbut, Obama..." "Yahbut, librerals..." "Yahbut, Mexicans..." "Yahbut Muslims..."