ECT Peter, Paul, and Division
- Thread starter SaulToPaul 2
- Start date
Once again, another Darby follower embarrasses himself.
Mede claimed that at the second coming, the believers would first be raptured and meet the Lord in the air while the Lord descended to planet earth to inflict judgment on the unbelievers as described in 2 Peter 3:10
Mede doesn't have a tribulation period after a secret rapture, and then a return of Christ.
According to Dispensationalsim, 2 Peter 3:10 takes place at the end of the alleged millennium. Mede has 2 Peter 3:10 taking place when Christ descends.
Identify this "everyone" that saw this un-physical Saviour, allegedly return in AD 70.
What's the problem, sweetie-5 years, and counting.
Craigie suffers another death knell!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Does God invent? Are not all false doctrines, by definition, "man made inventions?" How does "man made inventions," toots, support your "man made invention," and disprove others? Well, sweetie? Why add those words, Wimpy?
It doesn't take predisposition.
Even a person with a limited vocabulary can understand that "near", "soon", "these last days", "the culmination of the ages", "shortly", "this generation", "the end is near", etc don't refer to events 2,000 years into the future.
But that's what has to happen in order to be a Darby follower.
Watch him spin the above...Watch....
Notice how Tet is carrying on about Darby, not addressing these points?
I already addressed it.
Go back and read posts #4 and #6.
Peter and Paul both preached the same thing regarding atonement.
"Luis del Alcázar wrote about Preterism before Russell....Plus, I can show a bunch more of men that taught Preterism before Russell was even born."-sweetie Tellalie
Was del Alcázar a man, Craigie? So, you admit that you follow a man, and a bunch of men?
Vs.
"You follow the teachings of men."-Craigie, over 200 times on TOL
You pathetic fraud, so obsessed, that you engage in sophistry, deceit.That is your MO on TOL, you vile, satanic loser.
Was del Alcázar a man, Craigie? So, you admit that you follow a man, and a bunch of men?
Vs.
"You follow the teachings of men."-Craigie, over 200 times on TOL
You pathetic fraud, so obsessed, that you engage in sophistry, deceit.That is your MO on TOL, you vile, satanic loser.
I already refuted his claim.
Mede didn't teach Darby' secret rapture.
Nobody taught Darby's rapture theory before Darby invented it in 1830
And it was shown to you that Romans 6 was before 70 AD. That is when you start in about Darby because you cannot win the debate on merit.
Paul teaches the rapture, it's only a descriptive word.
Romans 6 doesn't support your claim.
Romans 13 was written after Romans 6
(Rom 13:11) And do this, understanding the present time: The hour has already come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed.
How was Paul's salvation nearer than when he first believed?
Wrong again.
The first time the word "Darby" is found in this thread, it is in post #20 by Danoh.
I can win the debate with scripture. Scripture always proves Dispensationalism wrong, especially Mid-Acts Dispensationalism.
Paul never taught that Israel's prophetic clock was stopped, followed by secret parenthetical dispensation, followed by a secret rapture, followed by a 7 year trib that includes a third temple, followed by a subsequent coming of Jesus, followed by an exactly 1,000 year time period that includes animal sacrifices for sin atonement.
With the exception of the millennial kingdom on earth heresy, all the other above heresies were invented by Darby.
No, you did not, you greasy slimy, loser, child of the devil.
"Nobody taught Darby's rapture theory before Darby invented it in 1830."-666th spam
Now, you child of the devil-one more time:
1. It is quite irrelevant, when you/anyone discovers objective truth, for, if it were, you would "argue," loser, that the earth was spherical, at one time, that the person identified as "God the Father," was not such a person, until the Lord Jesus Christ revealed Him, as such, "The Reformation" doctrines of the 1500's is false.
2. One more time, you demon: Will you leave TOL, if I can show you, habitual liar, where you asserted that # 1 above is correct, i.e., truth is discovered, and it is irrelevant as to its "recent-ness."
Come on, sweetie-be a "man" for a change.
3. Show us, before you, where anyone taught:
-that "the Lord Jesus Christ" never taught the law, as you assert
-that the Roman army was the second coming, as you assert
-that the law was "nailed to the cross," as you assert, and that there is no law today, and thus, everyone is saved
-that the word of God, has errors, as you assert="errors only-ism"
"the Greek only-ism," as you assert
-that there is no redemption of the body, as you assert
Here is a softball, Wimp. Name one "non man" teacher, that has ever taught, what you allegedly "teach," on TOL, before you. Name name(s), since you, on record, assert that you never "follow the teachings of men."
Come on, Wimpy-give me your best shot.
You won't. You disgusting, habitual liar, demon.
Does God invent? Why do you add "man made" invention, you habitual promoter of sophistry?
No, you did not. Answer the question, punk.
Still waiting, you punk, for you to address whether these "more than one" man/ men, were, in fact, men, that taught you AD 70-ism/Preterism "invention."
Effeminate, spineless, obsessed wimpy Craigie suffers another death knell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Again, you demon: Will you leave TOL, if I can show you, habitual liar, where you asserted that when you discover objective truth, is quite irrelevant, in determining it's veracity, i.e., truth is discovered, and it is irrelevant as to its "recent-ness."
What do you say, punk: Want another shot, at the title?
And identify these infallible AD 70-ism/Preterist teachers, that you claim, taught/teach you.
Not a peep.
And "ya know," prissy, that Paul tells you that lying, and sodomy, and not providing for your own,since you are unemployed, is a sin, don't you, Craigie? Why don't you follow Paul, Craigie?
Again, you demon: Will you leave TOL, if I can show you, habitual liar, where you asserted that when you discover objective truth, is quite irrelevant, in determining it's veracity, i.e., truth is discovered, and it is irrelevant as to its "recent-ness."
What do you say, punk: Want another shot, at the title?
And identify these infallible AD 70-ism/Preterist teachers, that you claim, taught/teach you.
Not a peep.
And "ya know," prissy, that Paul tells you that lying, and sodomy, and not providing for your own,since you are unemployed, is a sin, don't you, Craigie? Why don't you follow Paul, Craigie?
Hey, little/scrawny armed Craigie "Barney Fife" Tellalie!!!
Since you are an unemployed infidel, thus,not following Paul, as you cutely accuse us meanie dispies, who continue to hurt your fragile feelings, here is an idea!!!!!: Why not put your name up for the NFL draft, and perhaps some team will claim you as "Mr. Irrelevant," the same rep that you have on TOL?
That's pretty funny, don't you think? Give us a "Err, no...," cute saying? Nah-forget that idea-you are too fragile, both physically, and mentally, sweetie. for war. Poor Craigie...
Since you are an unemployed infidel, thus,not following Paul, as you cutely accuse us meanie dispies, who continue to hurt your fragile feelings, here is an idea!!!!!: Why not put your name up for the NFL draft, and perhaps some team will claim you as "Mr. Irrelevant," the same rep that you have on TOL?
That's pretty funny, don't you think? Give us a "Err, no...," cute saying? Nah-forget that idea-you are too fragile, both physically, and mentally, sweetie. for war. Poor Craigie...