Not necessarily true, Dan P.
Paul preached about at least 7 different mysteries, yet there is only one Body.
One Mystery, comprised of various aspects unique to said Mystery.
Not necessarily true, Dan P.
Paul preached about at least 7 different mysteries, yet there is only one Body.
Not necessarily true, Dan P.
Paul preached about at least 7 different mysteries, yet there is only one Body.
Just say simply what the gap of Acts 15 is or shut up. You are an "expert" on me, not on the passage. Every one of your posts shows that. you would rather comment on me than the text. It's hooey.
Not necessarily true, Dan P.
Paul preached about at least 7 different mysteries, yet there is only one Body.
Hi and I was trying to say a different point , is why I wrote that !!
His main message was the MYSTERY kept hidden , from the Ages and Generations , period !! Eph 1:4 and Col 1:25 and 26 and Paul did not speak of two Bodies , Soul sleep ETC , ETC !!
dan p
Consider his point DP.
He wrote "Not necessarily true, Dan P....Paul preached about at least 7 different mysteries, yet there is only one Body."
If I have understood him and heir properly, they hold that Romans 16:26's "scriptures of the prophets" refers to a Mystery salvation preached by Paul that was hidden in the OT.
They also hold that Ephesians 2 is not that salvation.
Thus, his... "Not necessarily true, Dan P....Paul preached about at least 7 different mysteries, yet there is only one Body."
Its why I asked you in another post, DP, if you held to Romans 16:26's "scriptures of the prophets" in the same sense that Brock had held to it - that it is a reference to Paul's own writings.
Thus far, that makes two different views on the sense of that verse, of the three views held.
Fascinating...
Hi and in post #22 , I lsted 10 points that Paul wrote about and I do not think that it is complete !
If you are Acts 9 , you leave a lot to be desired , for an Acts 9:6 that can not explain HOW Paul was saved not believe that Col 1:25 an verse 26 apply nor believe Eph 1:4 OR 2 Tim 1:9 !!
We were CHOSEN before the foundation of creation , don't you see ??
This is why I say that Dispensationalist are also messed up along with everyone else !!!
dan p
what is the gap of Acts 15?
In between God’s’ turning from Israel in His wrath, and His blessing of Believing Israel...is His pouring out His wrath upon them, Amos 9:8a and 8b and 8c.
The conclusion at Acts 15 being that God's visit among the Gentiles was in agreement with Amos 9: 8a and 8b's gap in time prior to believing Israel's own blessing - a gap in time in between their own blessing that their Prophets had foreseen:
God turns from Israel in His wrath... this then follows His pouring out of His wrath... followed by Believing Israel's blessing.
But God had kept a secret, and now that read as follows:
God turns from Israel in His wrath... (but then He reveals a Mystery visit among the Gentiles)...this then follows His pouring out of His wrath... followed by Believing Israel's blessing, Rom. 11:23-29.
As this Mystery visit of God's among the Gentiles is within Believing Israel's delayed blessing, it is in agreement with it - it does not make God's promise to Israel "of none effect," Rom. 3:3.
Of course, this is reading Paul into Luke, not your other way around.
Its why I asked you in another post, DP, if you held to Romans 16:26's "scriptures of the prophets" in the same sense that Brock had held to it - that it is a reference to Paul's own writings.
We'll have to differ on this chosen aspect.
My own understanding as to the Mystery's eternal glory aspect (God's intent in a New Creature) is that before the foundation of the world, the Father determined to do some things in - His - Son by Spirit in a New Creature: The Body of Christ.
And that the moment we trust the gospel of our salvation, and the Spirit places in the Son, that we then become part of this that Paul refers to as - note carefully - chosen in Him, Romans 8.
Til then, we are not a part of that, we are, in fact: lost. We are, in Adam, by nature, the children of disobedience, Eph. 1-3.
What are you; a Calvinist :chuckle:
Hi and you say , you disagree , so , all of it or which part ??
Not a Calvinist ??
dan p
We were not chosen before the foundation of the world. That is not what Eph. 1:4, and its surrounding passages, says.
Yours is what a surface level, or first impression reading will lead one to conclude the passage(s) appear to be saying.
Hi and who did you learn that from ?
Eph 1:4 says , Just as He CHOOSES for Himself in Him BEFORE / PRO overthrow of World us to be holy and without Blemish BEFORE/PRO Him in love !!
#1 , The verb " He hath chosen " is in the PAST TENSE an what is called the AORIST TENSE and means it happened before the creation of the world !!
#2 , The other Greek verb is " should be /EINAI is in the Greek Present TENSE and means we have to be a CONTINUOUS ACTION of being CHOSEN !!
#3 Check G 1586 in STRONG'S to see what CHOSEN means and this means you are dead WRONG in your REPLY .
Only Low informational students believe what you wrote and 2 Tin 1:9 really shoots you down !!
dan p
From what little I know, you appear to have the Greek senses down well enough, and often do, as they are just their rules of Grammar within that language, no big deal.
What you're often missing is the scope and setting within which Paul is using them.
And ones does not get that from verb tenses, mood modifiers and all the rest.
Rather, from within the "culture" (Body Truth) Paul was given to lay the foundation of and write from.
Time you got off your Romans 11 high horse as to this higher adavantage in the Greek you have concluded you have; time you try some Romans 12 mind renewing.
The Greek sense is very important, yes. But in its place; within its important contribution to a sense of the whole picture, not as the whole picture itself.
Otherwise it too often leads to as many off-base assertions as merely taking a passage as it reads often results in.
Hi and you did not reply to Eph 1:4 or maybe 2 Tim 1:9 would be worst for anyone writing what you wrote !!
The verb tenses help explain what the Holy Spirit really wanted to say , so get with the Holy Spirit !!
Matthew through Revelation is written in Greek and not in English , don't you see !!
Gal 3:28 explains the 12 IN and the 12 OUT position and without the Greek all is conjecture so , what verse in Rom 11 do you disagree with me ??
Give me ONE ??
You say get off my high Horse , so how HIGH IS YOUR HORSE ??
dan p
Paul is not talking about what was given to us before the foundation of the world, rather; to what was given to us IN Christ.
Its in HIM.
You become a part of what God chose to do IN HIM only IF you believe the gospel of ITS salvation.
You become a part of this New Creature He chose to form IN HIM only IF you believe.
You are THEN "accepted IN the Beloved."
Only THEN does God put you IN His Son, and begins to form your inward man INTO the image of His Son, Rom. 8; Eph. 4.
Are you not aware that just about everything in Ephesians is in Romans and visa versa?
Because Romans is the Cross of Ephesians and Ephesians is the eternal purpose of Romans.
One is the issue of the Cross' Mystery salvation, the other is the issue of unto what intended Mystery purpose is said salvation.
That is the setting, scope, and context we need to read all that Greek mood, sense, object, etc., from.
Hi and you can never address Eph 1:4 and I said for you to examine 2 Tim 1:9 and in that verse it does have the Greek words " in Christ " BUT you will not listen !!
How high is your HORSEY ??
DAN P