Quincy
New member
:doh: go back and read it again, particularly this part: "I think we can all agree that the thieves are guilty of the crime of theft. I think we can all agree that the rapists are guilty of the crime of rape."
if i make a habit of drinking to excess and driving like a maniac and crash my truck and end up in a hospital, you're going to be sympathetic to me when i whine about how unfair it is that i have two broken legs? :freak:
i'll bet not
i'll bet you're going to be more apt to say "Serves you right, moron - how many times have we told you not to drive drunk?"
and you'd be right :thumb:
I would be sympathetic because there would be reasons a person would make such a bad choice. I'd never shame or accuse anyone for making a mistake. That's what people who have feel empathy do, as far as I can tell. Making a bad choice or being in the wrong place at the wrong time doesn't equal an action on par with a crime. A mistake is not always a crime.
Despite of what might have happened to you in the past, Koban, not every women is making a deviant choice when something happens to them that involves pre or extra marital encounters. Each person is responsible for their own actions and each action warrants its own degree of culpability. An attack on someone is a crime and deserves prosecution. A bad judgement call isn't and only warrants some mentoring or guidance at most. Punishing the person attacked only maginalizes the attacker and what he/she did and that's the point of my reply to you.
The logic you're using here nullifies every crime ever committed.