Yep.Where's barb and his pals? He must be waiting for the spin doctors in liberal media to work it's magic.
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/371882-ryan-gop-memo-not-an-indictment-of-fbi-dojWHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, W.Va. — Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) on Thursday defended an unreleased House GOP memo that alleges abuses by the FBI and Justice Department, saying that it’s not an “indictment” of those government institutions.
“What this is not is an indictment on our institutions, of our justice system. This memo is not an indictment of the FBI, of the Department of Justice. It does not impugn [special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia] investigation or the deputy attorney general,” Ryan said at a retreat for GOP lawmakers in West Virginia.
As Paul Ryan said yesterday...
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/371882-ryan-gop-memo-not-an-indictment-of-fbi-doj
Which is a pretty good summary of the memo, isn't it? Did you guys really believe it was going to be otherwise?
C'mon. Don't get upset; get smart.
Ah, so you suddenly think Paul Ryan is the fount of all truth.
As you see, he called it precisely right this time. He might not be the most honest person on Earth, but he's no fool. Do you think he didn't know what would happen when the memo was released, and wasn't what the whackos were predicting it to be?
It's everything it was predicted to be.
You must be watching the lame stream media.
You never read it? It is, as one Trump supporter here admitted, "nothing."
He might not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he got that right.
Nothing except proof the FBI lied to the FISA courts.
Quote a lie the FBI made to the FISA courts followed with proof said statement was indeed a lie
The FBI used the Steel dossier to obtain a FISA warrant....testified to by Andrew McCabe.
You look it up. The last sentence of section four of the memo.
Actually, as Nunes admitted on the last page, it was a drunken slip by a Trump campaign official that first tipped them off. The Steele document was only part of it.
So now, it's time to show that the FBI denied that the Steele document had any part in the FISA process.
What do you have?
They used the Steel Dossier, and it was at the top of the list.
It was a political hit piece paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign.
I don't have to prove anything to you. It's why they fought so hard to keep this from being released.
Just watch....more is coming out.
...the truth will out.
He's still wiping the egg off his face.They used the Steel Dossier, and it was at the top of the list. It was a political hit piece paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. I don't have to prove anything to you. It's why they fought so hard to keep this from being released. Just watch....more is coming out. I know you hate it, but that's the way it goes....the truth will out.
1. The FBI had received FISA warrants as early as 2014, 2 years before the Steele Dossier was written so obviously the FBI had enough "intel" on Carter Page without the Dossier!They used the Steel Dossier, and it was at the top of the list. It was a political hit piece paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. I don't have to prove anything to you. It's why they fought so hard to keep this from being released. Just watch....more is coming out. I know you hate it, but that's the way it goes....the truth will out.
1. Different warrants. Every 90 days. Requires brand new evidence.1. The FBI had received FISA warrants as early as 2014, 2 years before the Steele Dossier was written so obviously the FBI had enough "intel" on Carter Page without the Dossier!
2. The Nunes Committee refused, for reasons that they have yet to explain, to allow FBI Director Wray to testify before it!
3. There has been no attempt by the Committee to review the FISA Court decisions on Carter Page to determine on what basis the judges made their decisions, nor had the Committee taken the time to interview the FISA judges