Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Fundamentalist nuttiness that would plunge the world into WWIII?
Discuss...
Discuss...
In my opinion WWWIII should have started in 2001 and we should have nuked them into oblivion.
![]()
Meh, between Kim Jong-un and the nutty guy in the WH, it's more a question of when than if ...
Beats the heck out of letting it continue for another 16 years.So you think we should have had full scale thermonuclear war sixteen years ago?
Okay then.
Beats the heck out of letting it continue for another 16 years.
Fundamentalist nuttiness that would plunge the world into WWIII?
Discuss...
The world????So your solution would have been to blow up the world back then and you're presumably still for that now?
Not me.Some folk seem to think by blowing up Mecca it would destroy Islam.
Not me.
That's not near enough to blow up.
The world????
:doh:
Not me.
That's not near enough to blow up.
Hes talking about me and musterion - i would warn them to get out, then blow up their kissing rock idol - which they would interpret as no allah
Some folk seem to think by blowing up Mecca it would destroy Islam.
That's just bluster ...
Wiping people or objects out does not change beliefs ...
You are nicer than me.Hes talking about me and musterion - i would warn them to get out, then blow up their kissing rock idol - which they would interpret as no allah
Of course it doesn't, but then again that's a sane point of view.
Some people here seem to think that an actual nuclear war would ruin their week off or something...
Indeed ... it's also fairly absurd to raise the banner of pro-life or pro-child when nuking all of those Muslims would include unborn babies, babies and children. :think:
You are nicer than me.
I don't see a need for a warning.
It's war.
You can't have war without casualties.
And in every war, the side with the most casualties is usually the one that surrenders or gets burnt to the ground.
People expecting that there can be a 'nice' war (one without lots of casualties) are just fooling themselves.