I happened to come across this story this morning and thought it posed an interesting question:
The rights/accomodations of an individual/few VS rights of most.
No Sandwich Is More Important Than a Child's Life
In this particular case, I found myself agreeing with the mom. The risk to her daughter should far outweigh the momentary joy
of eating peanuts during the few hours these children are at preschool.
Interesting story.
I would have to conclude that the mother can only rely on the compassion of others, and it should not become any type of rule or law for the other children.
And if the mother is willing to send her child to eat in a place where there is a possibility of peanut butter being in the vicinity, then it is SHE that is putting her child at risk because there are way too many variables that could go wrong for her daughter's safety.
Somebody, at some time, is going to be in a hurry and forget about the peanut butter issue.
One could as easily ask, "
Is the child's education worth more than her life?" Why bother with public education if it is going to put her daughter in such a high risk situation? What in the world is going to happen when she reaches college?
While I, personally, would not send a peanut butter sandwich with my child because of the girl's allergy problem; there is still the risk that I may be in a hurry some day and forget.
To me, the mother is taking a huge risk with the life of her daughter.
The surest solution would be to home school.
Tough one, Rusha. Kinda between a rock and hard place.
:think: