John 3:16 (KJV) (compare 1st Timothy 1:16 KJV) This.1 Timothy 1:3 As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine,
No other doctrine than what?
From the scriptures it appears to be "no other doctrine" than what Paul received, preached and taught: Romans 16:17 KJV, Philippians 3:17 KJV, 1 Timothy 1:11 KJV, 1 Timothy 6:3 KJV, 2 Timothy 1:13 KJV, 2 Timothy 2:2 KJV, 2 Timothy 2:7-8 KJV, 2 Timothy 2:15 KJV, 2 Timothy 3:10 KJV and not: Philippians 3:18-19 KJV, 1 Timothy 1:6-7 KJV.John 3:16 (KJV) (compare 1st Timothy 1:16 KJV) This.
So Paul did not teach 1st Timothy 1:16 (KJV), which bears, by any honest account, a striking similarity to John 3:16 (KJV)? :liberals: Me no understand.From the scriptures it appears to be "no other doctrine" than what Paul received, preached and taught: Romans 16:17 KJV, Philippians 3:17 KJV, 1 Timothy 1:11 KJV, 1 Timothy 6:3 KJV, 2 Timothy 1:13 KJV, 2 Timothy 2:2 KJV, 2 Timothy 2:7-8 KJV, 2 Timothy 2:15 KJV, 2 Timothy 3:10 KJV and not: Philippians 3:18-19 KJV, 1 Timothy 1:6-7 KJV.
From the scriptures it appears to be "no other doctrine" than what Paul received, preached and taught...
not seeing it. John was an apostle of the circ. Paul was the first for a pattern.So Paul did not teach 1st Timothy 1:16 (KJV), which bears, by any honest account, a striking similarity to John 3:16 (KJV)? :liberals: Me no understand.
Timothy was to charge men that they teach no other doctrine than that Paul preached. It's clear from all of the passages that speak of following Paul, holding fast to the form of sound words heard of Paul, committing what he heard of Paul, consider what Paul says and on and on because teaching what was preached in the Hebrew epistles would be an other gospel and doctrine!Paul preached "the gospel of the grace of God" (Acts 20:24) and according to him the believers who lived under the law and those who didn't were all saved by grace:
Timothy was to charge men that they teach no other doctrine than that Paul preached. It's clear from all of the passages that speak of following Paul, holding fast to the form of sound words heard of Paul, committing what he heard of Paul, consider what Paul says and on and on because teaching what was preached in the Hebrew epistles would be an other gospel and doctrine!
It's remarkable, the similarity between the two passages, is all:not seeing it. John was an apostle of the circ. Paul was the first for a pattern.
Paul says he was first for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting. It can't be the same if Paul's first!It's remarkable, the similarity between the two passages, is all:
1st Timothy 1:16 (KJV) " Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting. "
John 3:16 (KJV) " For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. "
Timothy was to charge men that they teach no other doctrine than that Paul preached.
It doesn't say "other doctrines". It's definitely no other doctrine than Paul's.No, the words "other doctrines" are referring to "false doctrines."
It doesn't say "other doctrines". It's definitely no other doctrine than Paul's.
It doesn't say "other doctrines". It's definitely no other doctrine than Paul's.
I don't need to. I agree that the charge to teach no other doctrine is anything contrary to sound doctrine.OK, it's "other doctrine."
But you failed to address anything else which I said.
I believe that sound doctrine is the doctrine Paul laid out in the form of sound words in Romans through Philemon. Doctrine found outside of Paul's epistles could be construed as unsound for a member of the Body of Christ as those of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John and Hebrews through Revelation had to DO things to prove their faith that we don't being in the but now.
" And Saul was consenting unto his death " Acts 8:1 (KJV). It could just be because Paul considered himself the chief of sinners (1Ti1:15KJV). None of the other Apostles had such an obvious and deep black mark on them, so Paul could be a pattern, being the first Apostle or otherwise, to be so powerfully forgiven of such grave matter, and so the first to reveal the magnificent power of the Lord's DBR so glaringly.Paul says he was first for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting. It can't be the same if Paul's first!
" And Saul was consenting unto his death " Acts 8:1 (KJV). It could just be because Paul considered himself the chief of sinners (1Ti1:15KJV). None of the other Apostles had such an obvious and deep black mark on them, so Paul could be a pattern, being the first Apostle or otherwise, to be so powerfully forgiven of such grave matter, and so the first to reveal the magnificent power of the Lord's DBR so glaringly.