Ooh...that's gonna' leave a mark! :noid:
ECT No one was "looking forward to the cross"
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
- Status
Ooh...that's gonna' leave a mark! :noid:
God's Truth
New member
I couldn't care any less what lies you say about me.
Jerry Shugart
Well-known member
Reminder:
Here is Debbie Downer Nag's "The Gospel," ....
"Any person who lives his life wrongly and does not repent of his sins, will be held responsible and judged for breaking God's laws and are justly consigned to death and hell. Sinners only receive what they have earned. Men reap what they sow."-evil "woman" Nag
....which is not "good news," but bad news, condemning each, and everyone of us, with this subjective " lives his life wrongly," and quite inadequate, as no one, has repented of all their sins, as in "stopped committing all sins"(wrong biblical definition of "repent"-employed "for the sake of the argument")even if this were the "good news." It is not. The reason the Lord Jesus Christ died for my/our sins????????????
-Because each and every one of us, does "live his/her life wrongly," in what we do, and do not do, in how we think, and in how we do not think, because we "come short" in meeting the bar demanded by a holy LORD God-"100% compliance," and "the righteousness of God."
-"repenting of our sins," as in "stop sinning," is impossible, as we commit sins, that we do not even know we commit. Regardless, the statement denies that the Lord Jesus Christ died for them. The entire reason that He did die for every last one of them? Because we cannot/do not repent of them!
A 7 year old "gets" this; most alleged "Christians" do not.
Memorize: Christ died for our sins.
God's Truth
New member
I am not Catholic. I preach much against the Catholic denomination. Musterion has been told many times that I am not Catholic. I do not think that he cares about the truth that he is told, he just wants to say whatever he can to defile another.
If the Blessed Virgin hadn't agreed to the Angel's proposal (Lk1:38KJV), then she wouldn't have given birth to the Savior. Agreed?
God's Truth
New member
She agreed to it before she was with child?
Nang
TOL Subscriber
This is Antinomian error and a strange message . . . :down:
Do you agree or not? The coming of the Lord required Mary's consent, yes or no.
God's Truth
New member
Again, prove with scripture that Mary agreed BEFORE she was told she would be with child.
You said she had to agree or what?
She was told she would be with CHILD and did not first consent.
God's Truth
New member
Matthew 1:18This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit. 19 Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.
20But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”
22All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: 23“The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel” (which means “God with us”).
24When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. 25But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.
These scriptures prove that the Catholics teach falseness when they say Mary was a perpetual virgin.
20But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”
22All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: 23“The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel” (which means “God with us”).
24When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. 25But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.
These scriptures prove that the Catholics teach falseness when they say Mary was a perpetual virgin.
You're suggesting, you snake, that Luke 1:31 (KJV) would have happened to her, even if she did not consent (Lk1:38KJV)? You filthy, filthy rat.
God's Truth
New member
I am glad that a righteous person has reported your abusive language.
As for Mary giving God consent...UNBELIEVABLE! How do you ever get that one would need to give God consent to do anything?
My abusive language?
Huh.
Anyway, please confess that you believe that, had Mary declined the Angel's proposition, that the Holy Spirit would have gone ahead anyway and impregnated her.
Go ahead now. Come on. Do it. Do it now, you vile scum of the earth. Evil user account.
God's Truth
New member
I would not give an answer to that evil question. It is not right to say God needs our consent for anything ever.
musterion
Well-known member
[MENTION=6696]Lon[/MENTION] , this is what I mean.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
You not only show yourself vile to GT, but you blaspheme the sovereignty of God.
No creature on this earth, including Mary, could have prevented God the Son from assuming human flesh in the womb of woman, in order to redeem His people, as covenanted in the Godhead from eternity.
So stop your stupid argument and wicked name calling.
"It is not right to say God needs a lady's consent before the Holy Spirit impregnates her," is what you agree with, correct? Yes or no.
Answer it.
Evil user account.
- Status