It's too late. Like Sammy Sosa, Mark McGwire, and Barry Bonds in the home run discussion, the layman will rightly say...."yeah, and?" knowing they cheated.
Yep.
Outside of New England, Tom Brady will be held in the same regard as Barry Bonds and A-Rod.
so why don't you talk about them?
The evidence is the balls that were checked, then put back into the custody of the Pats and then, inside the game, came up short. So there's no disputing a rule violation happened and it happened on their watch while they had possession and responsibility. We know everything but who. That alone gives the commissioner a green light, though more of one against the organization.No evidence,
You're just being a fan. Wear, don't eat the beanie. :chuckle:Make no mistake: I have a Pat's beanie worth to eat here. And will, if need be. (Seriously, did that dude just puke off a fence?)
Won't disagree there at all.Which in retrospect might have been more understandable if they took a stand against all the blood-curdling offenses we'd all endured. Our bad. All of us.
The evidence is the balls that were checked, then put back into the custody of the Pats and then, inside the game, came up short. So there's no disputing a rule violation happened and it happened on their watch while they had possession and responsibility. We know everything but who. That alone gives the commissioner a green light, though more of one against the organization.
I suspect the inability of the league to find that out won't save the Pats from some action post Super Bowl. The Saints lost a head coach for a year and there wasn't a bit of evidence he had any hand in or knew about the defensive bounty bit. The gist was that he should have known what was going on, but that was a broader problem. This one could be hidden from the coach by as few as two people. How is he supposed to know?
Tom...Tom is a harder sell, though I'll try that in a moment.
Here's a bone of contention I have with the league office: dragging out the process and "interviews" when they likely know all they're going to, interrupting the process of preparing for a Super Bow for one team doesn't seem fair.
Now before anyone cries, "They brought it on themselves" remember that all we can know is that someone, maybe as few as two or even (if less likely) one person did this and what if, for the sake of argument, the head "whatever they call whoever is responsible for the balls" knew about Tom liking underinflated balls and did something to help his qb on his own. Misguided, cheating, but then not really anyone else's fault because who else would know, absent accidental discovery, except Tom...and possibly not even Tom (I'll get to it).
Is it plausible? Well, it's possible. As for Aikman and other qbs who've been pretty clear that a qb handling a ball with up to two lbs per of air missing would know it and in light of Tom's earlier stated preference that seems to raise the likelihood of that...how could Brady have said the balls seemed fine to him?
Well, a couple of possible explanations. For one, he pulled a Clinton. Because it's unlikely he physically did the deed or knew precisely when it was done and "fine" isn't a comment on their inflation. He could be just fine with an underinflated ball. Another possibility is that it may be something that's been done routinely and in the "lone, well meaning wolf" scenario he wouldn't notice because the guy has been at it for a while. Or maybe Tom only thinks he knows the difference but isn't as sensitive to it as he thinks (thus his earlier comment).
At any rate it's a case I wouldn't mind defending before the commissioner. I think an aggressive defense could make the case for nominal team sanction.
Anyway, the Gronk comment was about the stupidest thing I'd read in a while. Not even Sherman would run his mouth on that count and some small cog is screaming for grease?
The NFL finally released a statement the other day. It didn't say much, but one of the things it did note was that the balls had been checked prior to the half time checking. So the foundation for control/responsibility is being put out. Where they go, how hard they come down is another matter, but they're putting the plate on the table.Assuming they were properly checked, of course. But I'll cede this much: Something weird happened probably while in Pats custody.
Maybe. I don't agree with Aikman that sanctions should be harsher than those meted out against the Saints. I think infractions have to be weighed on their own merits and prior bad acts, outside of the demonstrably habitual, shouldn't enter into it, unless you have a player or organization on some sort of probationary period. Else, where do you break the line at tolling?The whole ignorance is no excuse bit will probably come back into play, I figure. Goodell's friendship with Kraft will, oddly, probably factor into the sanctions being tougher than you'd expect. No pretense of favoritism and all that.
This really bothers me with its impact and the near dead certainty that they know everything they're going to. Just say here's what will happen next year and let everyone get on with it. Because you can't penalize the Pats within the context of the Super Bowl without damaging the championship game.Look, if they have the Pats dead to rights, at least let us know. This is bollocks.
Wouldn't surprise me, but Tom knew, had to really given he's stated he can tell, which is the only way you can announce a preference. I think he should have had better counsel on his press conference...now if he talks to the commissioner and says it a little differently behind closed doors...as in, "Sure, I noticed the balls seemed easier to handle, but I knew they'd been tested because they always are and I didn't know anyone had monkeyed with them so as far as I knew they were just on the low side of legal".Here's what I think is a very plausible scenario: A ball guy knows how #12 likes em, puts them at the very edge of what's acceptable...and then says to hell with it. Leak it a bit. The poor schmuck probably thought he was doing Brady a favor.
I don't think it's something that would have occurred to more than a couple of people. No, a conspiracy would be reaching. And it's really not in the league's best interest to in any way tarnish arguably the best qb of a generation (hey, I said arguably) especially over this sort of thing.Takes nothing away from the team in all three phases. Stupid, no doubt. Well meaning? I guess. But completely daft. A conspiracy? No way. As I said yesterday, I think the Pats are as interested in what happened as anyone else.
I think one of two things happens. They committee Gronk and Brady tears them up throwing away from him or they single and get cut up that way.That trash talk is going to be worth two touchdowns. Watch.
Yep.
Outside of New England, Tom Brady will be held in the same regard as Barry Bonds and A-Rod.
I'm sure some, but I doubt that many. Deflated balls on the same level as steroids? :idunno: Unless it comes out there was strong evidence of widespread use of deflated balls.
I'm sure some, but I doubt that many. Deflated balls on the same level as steroids? :idunno: Unless it comes out there was strong evidence of widespread use of deflated balls.
INFLATE THIS.
Ain't nothing gonna break my stride
Nobody's gonna slow me down, oh no, I've got to keep on moving
Ain't nothing gonna break my stride,
I'm running and I won't touch ground, oh no, I've got to keep on moving
GRONK: Two TD's.
BLOUNT: Two more on the ground.
Sleep well, Pete.
...And winners never cheat (Ps. 73:3, Ps. 94:3, 4, Prov. 24:19).[C]heaters never win...
...And winners never cheat (Ps. 73:3, Ps. 94:3, 4, Prov. 24:19).
See:
Only a Fool Envies Fools (right click, open) by Adrian Rogers
...[W]e don't know they cheated...