Yada, yada . . .
My question is, why did an ultradispensationalist believe the earth was flat in the 19th century . . . namely Bullinger?
It is irrelevant what your question is, Naggie, as I am in charge here, as I'm the director, and you're the dancer, and I, unlike other drones, don't fall for your "present a moving target...bait'nswitch...misdirection" deceptive ploy, as I stay on topic, and the topic is this:
Tet's "argument," that when you discover objective, determine's its veracity. So, I'll slow it down for you. Take a deep, deep, breath, and follow the bouncing ball, Mitch-ette, "cuz," as usual, you missed it, witchiepoo. Pay attention.
Tet. "argues" that the earth is flat, not me, as no one taught a "spherical earth," before 6 BC, as it was thought to be flat, thousands, and thousands of years, before that.
"The realization that the figure of the Earth is more accurately described as an ellipsoid dates to the 18th century (Maupertuis). In the early 19th century, the flattening of the earth ellipsoid was determined to be of the order of 1/300 (Delambre, Everest). The modern value as determined by the US DoD World Geodetic System since the 1960s is close to 1/298.25.[8]......."-Craigie's infallible authority, Wikipedia
And the earth is not "an ellipsoid," according to Craigie, because "no one taught it until the 18th century."