In other news, congress has finally broken the budget impasse that saw the budget being held hostage to a little known rider that concerned how to address the 9/11 tragedy. Apparently, Republicans wanted to ban Muslims from all flights while Democrats supported banning jets. The final compromise agreed upon was to prohibit the use of larger size jets except for military purposes while banning Muslims from all flights unless accompanied by an armed Christian.
MUSLIM TERRORISTS RAMPAGE IN BAKERSFIELD
- Thread starter fzappa13
- Start date
Think I missed my boat...
... and the point of this thread.
No, I think I got that. You think gun control is silly because you're afraid that terrorists will resort to spoons if they can't get their hands on guns. What would you say the threat level is of a spoon-armed person relative to a gun-armed person? Feel free to guess.
Forget that ... how about a JET? :shocked:
When was the last Christian beheading?
Looks like May 29th. Or at least that's the last one I can find.
http://news.yahoo.com/christian-beheads-jihadist-syria-revenge-killing-monitor-155615405.html
And then there was last year in Oklahoma:
http://aattp.org/christian-beheads-...practicing-witchcraft-religious-right-silent/
Has that ever happened? I mean, purchasing a jet? Because otherwise, we can pretty much terminate them with extreme prejudice if they have one.
Zeke
Well-known member
I would only be concerned if the government was also conducting a similar exercise at the same time in Bakersfield, Plus I would like to find out who would prosper from a spoon shortage before I blame six possible patsy types trotted out by the corporate media.
In my little analogy you'll note that the attackers and defendants were equally armed ... with spoons. When both any potential attackers and their targets are equally armed the outcome is not so sure and this, in and of itself, is pretty strong deterrent to the type of coward that thinks they are slaughtering the unarmed. Banning guns only endangers the law abiding in that the lawless will have no qualms about acquiring and using them. Spoons? Jets? We're just talking a matter of scale.
But, there is a more important point to this thread. Actually, several.
Why purchase one when you can steal it? Sorta like a gun ... or a spoon.
Last edited:
Ah, our media and it's effect on what we believe. Very good. I had hoped that, in changing the weapons but leaving the participants the same the media's role in this and the intent of both them and the politicians whose reputations they create might be a little more obvious to those who are swayed by them. Another very important point I hoped to make with my little offering.
It's easier if you can purchase. Of course, there will be some guns somewhere regardless of what we do, but if it's not legal to own them, you can be arrested the moment you're caught with them, and the guns taken out of circulation.
So? Maybe we should let people carry tactical nukes. Equally armed == no harm?
Because we all know someone we lost because they were spooned to death.
If you were going to kill someone, and you could choose a spoon or a gun, which would you choose?
And you don't think that's important?
To demonstrate that gun nuts are bad at math?
Maybe we could dig up two people, one who died by spoon and one who died by gun, and ask them which was more lethal.
If it was me you could bet it wasn't chicken ... :dead:
Those of us who have been to the Pen at any rate ...
Milicent Martyn, President of the Bakersfield branch of the NSA commented, 'Whilst we of course condemn all such senseless acts of violence, the National Spooners Association cannot in any way be blamed. Spooning is a national hobby. Even those who have had their eyes gouged out would have to be blind to think it was our fault. It had nothing to do with spoons being so freely available. It could just as easily have been a fork incident.'
Later in our programme we will be holding an interview with Uri Geller...
exminister
Well-known member
Mutual Assured Destruction aka MAD
It's the Cold War between the US and Russia just on a smaller scale.
Now spoons, what's next?
It's the Cold War between the US and Russia just on a smaller scale.
Now spoons, what's next?
