But they swore there would be no uptick in stoned driving.
Effects of drunk driving are much worse.
But they swore there would be no uptick in stoned driving.
:wave:
speaking of buying it
:think:
do the legal pot shops do free samples ?
Effects of drunk driving are much worse.
pot heads are catching up fast on the driving impaired fatality list,
in Colorado up a staggering 145%
link
The 2013-16 period saw a 40 percent increase in the number of all drivers involved in fatal crashes in Colorado, from 627 to 880, according to the NHTSA data. Those who tested positive for alcohol in fatal crashes from 2013 to 2015 — figures for 2016 were not available — grew 17 percent, from 129 to 151.
By contrast, the number of drivers who tested positive for marijuana use jumped 145 percent — from 47 in 2013 to 115 in 2016. During that time, the prevalence of testing drivers for marijuana use did not change appreciably, federal fatal-crash data show.
And the numbers probably are even higher.
State law does not require coroners to test deceased drivers specifically for marijuana use in fatal wrecks — some do and some don’t — and many police agencies say they don’t pursue cannabinoid tests of a surviving driver whose blood alcohol level is already high enough to charge them with a crime
a pothead with the equivalent usage of an alcoholicYou think alcoholics aren't losers?
"Alcohol consumption is one possible risk factor for Alzheimer's Disease." -- https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/arh25-4/299-306.htm
Effects of alcohol are much worse.
stoned drivers kill what is worse than that?
stoned drivers kill what is worse than that?
a pothead with the equivalent usage of an alcoholic
the pothead is going to be the loser
people can have 1 drink & drive
potheads think they can smoke dope & drive and they kill people
Colorado's transportation department after a 2014 study revealed a disturbing statistic: 43 percent of the state's marijuana users didn't know it was illegal to drive under the drug's influence.
link
from your link
A summary of 11 of these case-control studies showed that 9 of the studies found no significant relationship between alcohol use and AD, 1 found that alcohol use increased the risk, and 1 found that alcohol use decreased the risk of Alzheimer's Disease
CONCLUSIONS
Although it is biologically plausible that drinking increases the risk of AD, epidemiologic studies have not supported this hypothesis. Currently, no strong evidence suggests that alcohol use influences the risk of developing Alzheimer's Disease
"Teen alcohol use kills 4,300 people each year – that’s more than all illegal drugs combined." -- https://www.madd.org/statistics/
Sobriety is obviously the optimal state of mind, but by any standard of measure, wherever it can be said that pot is bad alcohol is much worse.
No point arguing with him.
don't worry dope will surpass alcohol , just give it time .
fatal crashes up 145 percent — from 47 in 2013 to 115 in 2016
No point arguing with him.
he is experimenting on himself to see if he can prevent getting Alzheimer's disease
taking one for the team
From the Washington Post:
A new study from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration finds that drivers who use marijuana are at a significantly lower risk for a crash than drivers who use alcohol. And after adjusting for age, gender, race and alcohol use, drivers who tested positive for marijuana were no more likely to crash than who had not used any drugs or alcohol prior to driving.
The chart above tells the story. For marijuana, and for a number of other legal and illegal drugs including antidepressants, painkillers, stimulants and the like, there is no statistically significant change in the risk of a crash associated with using that drug prior to driving. But overall alcohol use, measured at a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) threshold of 0.05 or above, increases your odds of a wreck nearly seven-fold.
The study's findings underscore an important point: that the measurable presence of THC (marijuana's primary active ingredient) in a person's system doesn't correlate with impairment in the same way that blood alcohol concentration does. The NHTSA doesn't mince words: "At the current time, specific drug concentration levels cannot be reliably equated with a specific degree of driver impairment."
You can read more at the source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...new-federal-data-show/?utm_term=.ab49f62ca9f7
Several states have passed laws attempting to define "marijuana-impaired driving" similarly to drunk driving. Colorado, for instance, sets a blood THC threshold of 5 nanograms per milliliter. But that number tells us next to nothing about whether a person is impaired or fit to drive.
What we do need, however, are better roadside mechanisms for detecting marijuana-related impairment
hardly ever
Heh.
don't worry dope will surpass alcohol , just give it time .
fatal crashes up 145 percent — from 47 in 2013 to 115 in 2016
Legalized recreational marijuana use in Colorado, Oregon and Washington correlates to about a 3 percent increase in auto collision claim frequencies compared to states without such legislation