Mainstream Science

[Avajs]

That magnetic striping is more pronounced at the surface is a fact that if you didn't know it, you haven't looked into the topic. And you aren't the one that determines how much doubt about a narrative someone can have based on the facts. Thus, it's up to you to bring evidence that makes your point.

Show us your evidence for magnetic striping and sea floor spreading.

Well, sorry, since the "main stream science" accepts sea floor spreading and uses magnetic striping as one of the bits of evidence, I think I'll wait for you to provide the "facts or logical doubts". Maybe you are correct, but I've never seen any evidence to support your position.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Well, sorry, since the "main stream science" accepts sea floor spreading and uses magnetic striping as one of the bits of evidence,

Appeals to popularity are logical fallacies.

Don't use logical fallacies to prop up your position.

I think I'll wait for you to provide the "facts or logical doubts".

Reminder, the ball is in your court to provide evidence for your position, see post #39.

Maybe you are correct,

But you won't test it.... why?

but I've never seen any evidence to support your position.

Another fallacy: Appeal to incredulity.

Is all you have logical fallacies?

 

[Right Divider]

Well, sorry, since the "main stream science" accepts sea floor spreading and uses magnetic striping as one of the bits of evidence, I think I'll wait for you to provide the "facts or logical doubts". Maybe you are correct, but I've never seen any evidence to support your position.

Someone was a poser from the start...

 

[Avajs]

Someone was a poser from the start...

Uh, no. Even you know what those scientists who actually are involved in the study of plate tectonics/sea floor spreading take as evidence for their theories. You are the one raising questions. You therefore must have studied the issue as well and have evidence to support your objection. Let's hear it.

 

[Right Divider]

Uh, no. Even you know what those scientists who actually are involved in the study of plate tectonics/sea floor spreading take as evidence for their theories.

SFS is NOT evidence... it is a bogus THEORY about the evidence.
The mid-Atlantic ridge is much more likely to be tension cracks. The evidence supports that far better than SFS.

You are the one raising questions.

What a concept!

You therefore must have studied the issue as well and have evidence to support your objection. Let's hear it.

Again, it is YOUR claim that SFS occurs. YOU made that claim and have YET to provide ANY support for it.

Watch some of Bryan Nickel's videos on YouTube. He gives some very good presentations of Dr. Walt Brown's HydroPlate Theory:

 

[Avajs]

I am aware of the Hydro Plate Theory.

 

[Right Divider]

I am aware of the Hydro Plate Theory.

Good for you.

 

[Right Divider]

Still not one sentence of support for SFS...