ECT MADists don't follow Paul

[tetelestai]

What's really funny to me, is that Danoh and mysteryboy spend all their time telling each other there's something wrong with me.

:rotfl:

I guess it makes them feel better about their Dispensationalism.

 

[john w]

He didn't much of an answer.

First off, he said the animal sacrifices after the cross were lawful. That's in direct contraction to Hebrews 10.

Secondly, he claimed there will be animal sacrifices in the future because he said Ezekiel's temple vision will take place literally.

That's pretty much all he said, and all his answers are very easily refuted with scripture.

Explain the animal sacrifices in Ezekiel, Isaiah, ......................you pathetic loser.

Go ahead. I, Hislston, others, have asked you, for years, little weakling punk, and all we get from you, weasel, is "Darby."

Explain them, once and for all, you pathetic excuse for a "man."


You won't, poser.

 

[musterion]

You won't, poser.

Best he'll do is say "spiritually fulfilled in Christ."

 

[tetelestai]

Now we got Little Johnny W joining Dahoh and mysterboy.

That makes 3 Darby followers who can't defend Darby's false teachings.

 

[tetelestai]

Best he'll do is say "spiritually fulfilled in Christ."

Yep.

Christ Jesus was the final and perfect sacrifice.

Worthy is the Lamb, who was slain.

 

[Danoh]

More ad hominem from another Darby follower who can't defend Darby's false teachings.

(Acts 17:24) God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

:rotfl:

Classic Jerry Shugart rinse and repeat.

You have long left reality behind for...

The Tet Zone...a dimension of rinse and repeat nonsense...

1 - When replied to, you assert MADs are unable to refute his Preterist nonsense.

2 - When ignored, you assert it is because MADs are unable refute his Preterist nonsense.

3 - When ad homiened, you assert it is because MADs are unable to refute his Preterist nonsense.

Yours is the self-induced Night Gallery of...

James 1:8's "A double minded man is unstable in all his ways."

 

[Danoh]

Now we got Little Johnny W joining Dahoh and mysterboy.

That makes 3 Darby followers who can't defend Darby's false teachings.

Rinse and repeat...

 

[musterion]

It really is obsessive.

 

[Danoh]

What's really funny to me, is that Danoh and mysteryboy spend all their time telling each other there's something wrong with me.

:rotfl:

I guess it makes them feel better about their Dispensationalism.

Rinse and repeat...

 

[musterion]

I joke about a lot I probably shouldn't, but stuff like this is downright spooky.

 

[john w]

(Ezk 45:17) It will be the duty of the prince to provide the burnt offerings, grain offerings and drink offerings at the festivals, the New Moons and the Sabbaths—at all the appointed festivals of Israel. He will provide the sin offerings, grain offerings, burnt offerings and fellowship offerings to make atonement for the Israelites.

Many Darby followers like Tambora claim the future animal sacrifices will be for "memorial" purposes only.

However, that's not what is found in Ezekiel's vision.

Ezekiel's vision makes it clear there will be animal sacrifices for sin offerings and atonement.

Explain the animal sacrifices, depicted in Ezekial, Isiah.....you stuttering little punk.


Let me guess: I, little arms, no spine Craigie, since I do not understand the sacrifices, offerings, laid out in the bible, assert that what I cannot understand, due to that 2 Corinthians 4:4 KJV/1 Corinthians 2:14 KJB problem of mine, I will not believe. Since I do not understand them, there are no sacrifices depicted in the bible, in the future, just as I do not understand the sacrifices, offerings, depicted in the book of Acts, post cross. Therefore, what I do not understand, I will not believe, and subtly(Genesis 3:1 KJV), craftily, not believe, and will dismiss them, as I assert, satanically, that there are no sacrifices, offerings, post cross, and they should be deleted from the bible. My daddy, the devil, taught me that, way back in Genesis. Atheists uses the same approach in dismissing the concept of hell, Craigie's future residence. It's called humanism.

 

[tetelestai]

James 1:8's "A double minded man is unstable in all his ways."

You need to take a remedial course in Dispensationalism.

Dispensationalism teaches that the book of James is not for the BOC.

I on the other hand am not a Darby follower, and have no problem using the book of James for today.

Therefore, I can tell you the following verse applies to you:

(James 2:20) But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?

 

[ClimateSanity]

More ad hominem from another Darby follower who can't defend Darby's false teachings.

(Acts 17:24) God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

Is there some point you are making with the temple verse in Acts?

 

[tetelestai]

I joke about a lot I probably shouldn't, but stuff like this is downright spooky.

Yes, it's kind of weird how 3 to 4 Darby followers spend all their time making post after post about me, instead of actually discussing scripture.

 

[ClimateSanity]

:rotfl:

Classic Jerry Shugart rinse and repeat.

You have long left reality behind for...

The Tet Zone...a dimension of rinse and repeat nonsense...

1 - When replied to, you assert MADs are unable to refute his Preterist nonsense.

2 - When ignored, you assert it is because MADs are unable refute his Preterist nonsense.

3 - When ad homiened, you assert it is because MADs are unable to refute his Preterist nonsense.

Yours is the self-induced Night Gallery of...

James 1:8's "A double minded man is unstable in all his ways."

What is the standard by which something is judged as refuted? Is it when you convinced yourself you have. It looks like the realm of those who claim to always be refuting this or that to be the realm of the self deluded.

 

[ClimateSanity]

Yes, it's kind of weird how 3 to 4 Darby followers spend all their time making post after post about me, instead of actually discussing scripture.

They post about you because you pester them with incessant questions.

 

[john w]

"You never ignore me, you spend countless hours babbling on and on about me personally instead of actually addressing the topic."-wining, effeminate little cry baby Craigie


Vs. "MADists are dumb."-actress Wimpy Craigie

You sniveling actress, hypocrite, and cry baby weasel:

"Do you spend time with your family?"-Don


Tellalie: No, I am obsessed with MAD, those meanie dispies, who hurt my feelings, years ago, resulting in my losing my spine. and now I spend 16 hours/day, on TOL, letting others pervert the gospel of Christ, as I do, as long as they are anti-dispie.

 

[Danoh]

You need to take a remedial course in Dispensationalism.

Dispensationalism teaches that the book of James is not for the BOC.

I on the other hand am not a Darby follower, and have no problem using the book of James for today.

Therefore, I can tell you the following verse applies to you:

(James 2:20) But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?

Nice attempt at baiting one into a debate so you can engage one of the other two of your "three pronged" rinse and repeat strife formula :chuckle:

 

[john w]

Now we got Little Johnny W joining Dahoh and mysterboy.

That makes 3 Darby followers who can't defend Darby's false teachings.

Explain the animal sacrifices, you pathetic, both emotionally, and physically, little arms wimp.

 

[Danoh]

They post about you because you pester them with incessant questions.

Careful there. Any attempt at reason with someone so ensnared in the need to double bind others is a sure way to end up in their treacherous web of self-deceit.