How long could you go without sinning?
ECT MADists don't follow Paul
- Thread starter tetelestai
- Start date
How long could you go without sinning?
Hey steko, how's your "thinking about it" going in regards to the Christians fleeing to the mountains in 70AD?
Got any "History of Preterism" graphs Little Johnny?
Got any job leads, wimpy gayboy?
You'll notice that Clay looks like you. Other pictures of him, that you have, show how tiny, wimpy, weasel like, are his arms, just like yours!!!
Have you ever excercised in your life, little chin boy, weasel?
Craigie suffers another death knell!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lifts some weights, or something, or get out of the house, you pathetic looking/acting wimp.
Right Divider
Body part
I am serious. I've seen parts of parts of a verse referred to with a letter before, but not chapters.
Unless, of course, there's just a missing chapter there.
Either way you don't need to try the old "let's put him down and try to make him look stupid". It only make you look stupid.
But it is what I've come to expect from you.
whitestone
Well-known member
I think it's as if they read through Deuteronomy 29 and 30 and did not denote that it is both an blessing and an curse. They look through and see only the blessing and say "I'm part of that",,,and forget to see the curse. Never the less by enjoining themselves unto it they also now partake of it in it's entirety and blindness in part is fallen upon them until the fullness of the times of the gentiles..., as it is written. If you say to them all the day long that the body of Christ is no part in this they will never see why.
So, when you said:
"The Bible isn't a crossword puzzle", that wasn't putting Interplanner down?
See, that's the problem with you Darby followers. You guys are so arrogant, sarcastic, and cocky until someone does the same thing to you. Then you all cry like little kids, report posts, etc.
Right Divider
Body part
You are much dumber than I thought.
I was not comparing Israel's old covenant with Israel's new covenant.
Said like the true dummy you are.
We are NOT under the old or the new.
(Of course, now you'll run to the "law of Christ" to "refute" me.... like the equivocating idiot that you are).
Once AGAIN, Paul never writes even ONCE about the body of Christ having a priesthood!
Right Divider
Body part
I felt that I was poking a little fun at him, unlike you. I will be more careful in the future. OK?
That's really rich, coming from the resident wimp/weasel of TOL, who wines, and cries, and pines, and mutters like the punk he is, that he is "attacked," "insulted," "called names, and "misquoted," on every thread, all the while, doing the same.
Weasel. Act like a man, you twit.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Read the Epistle to the Hebrews. Answer is contained therein.
And it won't burn your eyes out . . .
Interplanner
Well-known member
We are most definitely in the new covenant, and the law is followed in a new way, and we are a kingdom of priests.
Right Divider
Body part
Why do you have such a hard time with the CONTEXT here?
Right Divider
Body part
Then you are out of the will of God regarding what He is doing NOW...
Right Divider
Body part
I'm going GREEN!!!You should have put the following graph on your car:
P.S. That's a poor chart.
Forgive him, he meant a kingdom of bookworms :chuckle:
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Context?
Here?
Do you have an explanation why the Epistle to the Hebrews would be supposedly out of context to all members of TOL?
Does the "context" of TOL beliefs, find some kind of license that allows them to omit or take away from Holy Scripture?
Where does the SofF of TOL eliminate the Epistle to the Hebrews as not being part of God's inspired Word?