:doh:
Now I get it, this is the same routine you do with Darby and Bullinger.
Ah, the old "Darby and Bullinger" stumper. Next up, part of the trifecta:
2. "MAD is a false non-Biblical belief system that was made up by fallable men."-Craig
3.http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3133914&posted=1#post3133914
"No one held to the tenets of MAD until John Nelson Darby invented dispensationalism in the mid 1800'"-Preterist con man Tet.
vs.
" That's not my argument.
I have never said that dispensationalism was "wrong" because of how old it was. I specifically said that no one taught about Christ coming back twice before Darby did."-Tet.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...=82922&page=98
“I never said it was wrong for how old it is.”-Tet.
"No matter how hard you try, you can't take away the fact that dispensationalism was invented by John Nelson Darby in the mid 1800's...Why are most dispensationalists afraid and/or embarrassed to acknowledge that Darby invented what they believe?"-Deceiver Tet.
"My argument is that if there is not one single trace of something for 1,800+ years by anyone, then it was invented.”-Tet.
"... Deep down you know that your belief system has only been around for not even 50 years, and that it was "developed" by men..."-con artist Partial Preterist Soddy Tet.
"...Your false teachings of men is a false teaching since there is not one trace of it in the first three centuries. None of the early church fathers taught your theory, its only about 50 years old."-con artist Partial Preterist Soddy Tet.
"MAD didn't exist until the mid 1800's"-con artist Partial Preterist Tet.