Interplanner
Well-known member
If any of the D'ist beliefs are true, the conflict with Judaism and the problem of Peter's capitulation vanish. They are simply non-issues that never happened.
What?If any of the D'ist beliefs are true, the conflict with Judaism and the problem of Peter's capitulation vanish. They are simply non-issues that never happened.
If any of the D'ist beliefs are true, the conflict with Judaism and the problem of Peter's capitulation vanish. They are simply non-issues that never happened.
What?
What kind of OP is that?If any of the D'ist beliefs are true, the conflict with Judaism and the problem of Peter's capitulation vanish. They are simply non-issues that never happened.
What?
You posted on that already; some time back.
But, desperate measures call - well, for desperate measures...repeated :chuckle:
Take your psych ops somewhere else. It is disgusting that you think you do theological work here ,but all it is is psych ops. If you have an aspect of the question to discuss, go ahead.
Take your psych ops somewhere else. It is disgusting that you think you do theological work here ,but all it is is psych ops. If you have an aspect of the question to discuss, go ahead.
What is the friction between the Gospel community and Judiasm? Between Peter and Paul?
Still no answers, just insecure posturing.
What friction? There was no friction between the messages, or the people. And there was no disappearance into thin air. The prior dispensation ran well beyond Acts.Tell me what the friction between the Christian message and Judaism, and between Peter and Paul was, and I will will show you how D'ism comes down on the side of Judaism.
There are deep connections between D'ism and Judaism and we all know MAD says the OT runs a certain distance in to Acts, TBD.
If you believe things like that, the point of friction between the Gospel of Ps 2, 16 and 110 and Judaism disappears into thin air.
If any of the D'ist beliefs are true, the conflict with Judaism and the problem of Peter's capitulation vanish.
If any of the D'ist beliefs are true, the conflict with Judaism and the problem of Peter's capitulation vanish.
They are simply non-issues that never happened.
What friction? There was no friction between the messages., or the people. And there was no disappearance into thin air. The prior dispensation ran well beyond Acts.
And if you want proof that Paul preached a different message than the 12 read Acts 15.
lol about Acts 15 because his sample in Acts 13 SAYS THE SAME THINGS THAT ACTS 2 AND 3 SAID. He shows Israel sinning but in that same tragedy Christ is justification from all sin for all who believe. And that these things were what was promised to the fathers.
This was totally unacceptable to Judaism, as you can tell, if notice the reaction of Judaism's leaders!! (What else would you notice, lol).
Are you just rambling?
How about you take the time to lay out an actual argument?
“But some of the sect of the Pharisees who believed rose up, saying, 'It is necessary to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.'”
Acts 15:5
Why would they say this if they were not keeping the Law? And remember, these were people who were believers as a result of the preaching of the 12. This shows the 12 were preaching the Law.
So, what part of the chapters you referenced do you think is so important?