London knife attack

This Charming Manc

Well-known member
You can cause you will not have a 9mm round lodged in your brain.

If this madman was loose in the states he would be armed with as gun and we would probably have 4 or 5 dead.

Criminals and terrorists don't get guns easily over here.

Just keep that in mind when one of your Muslims is attacking you.
 

musterion

Well-known member
You can cause you will not have a 9mm round lodged in your brain.

If this madman was loose in the states he would be armed with as gun and we would probably have 4 or 5 dead.

Criminals and terrorists don't get guns easily over here.

And that makes the wanton murder of innocents acceptable, doesn't it. As long as they're not killed by guns, it's okay - just an unfortunate tragedy. When a gun is involved, THEN it's morally repugnant and evil.
 

Truster

New member
And that makes the wanton murder of innocents acceptable, doesn't it. As long as they're not killed by guns, it's okay - just an unfortunate tragedy. When a gun is involved, THEN it's morally repugnant and evil.

There are no innocents. Judgement is targeted and never misses the mark.
 

This Charming Manc

Well-known member
No I didn't say that at all, you must be stupid or have an agenda to suggest I did.

I would like no one to be harmed, but I would prefer 1 with serious and two with light stab wounds, than 4 dead and 6 injured which is the likely outcome with a terrorist gun in the same situation.

Guns are much more effective killers and that is why I don't like public ownership of them.

And that makes the wanton murder of innocents acceptable, doesn't it. As long as they're not killed by guns, it's okay - just an unfortunate tragedy. When a gun is involved, THEN it's morally repugnant and evil.
 

rocketman

Resident Rocket Surgeon
Hall of Fame
No I didn't say that at all, you must be stupid or have an agenda to suggest I did.

I would like no one to be harmed, but I would prefer 1 with serious and two with light stab wounds, than 4 dead and 6 injured which is the likely outcome with a terrorist gun in the same situation.

Guns are much more effective killers and that is why I don't like public ownership of them.

That is why you need to stay across the pond as well.
 

This Charming Manc

Well-known member
That worked so well on September 11th.

You have lost well over 30 times that number to gun homicides since,

Also no country allows guns on planes, so even the wildest armchair warrior fantasy of heroic rescue on the plane would never have come about.

Or were you suggesting that if the people in the towers had more guns they could have shot the planes out of the sky?

or was just a moronic comment as usual?
 
Top