Liberal Decay

Chicago Mayor and former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is famous for saying that a crisis is a terrible thing to waste since it allows you to do things you might not be able to get done except for the emotions of the moment spurring calls to action.

Chicago’s bloody Memorial Day weekend, which saw a dozen people killed -- including a four-year-old-girl -- certainly proved no exception to Rahm’s Rule as he called for, wait for it, stricter gun control as he spoke at a luncheon honoring police officers for valor and service. “It’s not just about how many police you have, it’s about the quantity of guns that are on the street so we actually have gun laws that back up the men and women we just recognized,” Emanuel said.

This delusional sentiment warning that otherwise inanimate objects are the problem was echoed by White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest after a bloody holiday weekend in Baltimore saw 29 shot and nine killed:
When asked about the violence yesterday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest suggested more gun control was one of the solutions.
“Obviously there’s some common sense things we could do -- certainly passage of some gun safety laws in Congress that could keep guns out of the hands of criminals would be one thing that we could do to try to limit the violence,” Earnest said.
In response to this liberal talking point, which ignores the fact that Democratic bastions like Chicago and Maryland have the strictest gun control laws in the nation, Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke went on Fox Business Network’s Lou Dobbs to say that Rahmbo, a nicknamed earned for his White House ruthlessness, was shooting blanks in suggesting the problem was guns and not the criminals who use them:
Sheriff Clarke describes Emanuel as “dead wrong,” observing that “he must have gone to the same school that ‘president’ Barack Obama did on how to run a law enforcement agency. This is what happens when you have community organizers and academic elites and others who don’t know a thing about policing in the American ghetto start to dabble in police science.”

He says the cities experiencing these heightened levels of violence “might as well get used to it because this is what you’re going to have as long as you’re going to try to turn cops into social workers and you’re going to try to get them to emphasize de-escalation and more dialogue instead of going on the offensive to go after some very dangerous individuals.”
Read more at: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/05/sheriff_clarke_schools_rahmbo.html

The Democrats keep on wanting to do the same thing expecting different results. Let's see, isn't that the definition of insanity? Should we check every Liberal for signs of mental illness?
 

TIPlatypus

New member
If you banned guns over there. A lot less people would get shot. They would all be knifed instead. But stabbing someone with a knife is harder than shooting someone with a gun. You should amend the whichever amendment it is that allows you to carry guns.
 

The Horn

BANNED
Banned
In America , about 10,000 people a year are killed by guns . We have the least strict gun control laws of any civilized country .
Every year in Japan, with strict gun control , about TWO people are killed . Same thing in Europe . Much stricter gun control laws there, too .
Right-wingers foolishly equate sensible laws designed to control guns for safety with "gun-grabbing ". The second amendment does NOT say that the government may not make laws regulating guns for safety .
This amendment has to do with MILITIAS , which have been obsolete for centuries in America .
How many guns have been confiscated by the allegedly "gun-grabbing " Obama administration so far ? Zero . Zip . Nada >Zilch .
Gun control laws have NOTHING to do with Marxism or communism . The claim that Hitler and the Nazis confiscated guns
after getting power in the 1930s is completely bogus . Guns were not even an issue in Germany at that time .
 

TrakeM

New member
Would it really be so horrible if we required background checks?

We haven't tried gun control. We basically have no gun control laws.
 
Would it really be so horrible if we required background checks?

We haven't tried gun control. We basically have no gun control laws.
We've tried Gun Control since 1934 and it hasn't work yet. Doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results is insane.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...fect-new-crime-wave-hits-democrat-run-cities/

As the above article states, the crime wave is hitting the Democratic run states hardest. Maybe it's time to vote these criminals out of office? I don't trust our bloated government. The reason: history. I learn from it, the Democrats don't. They are a one trick pony without a new idea in the vacuous minds.
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
If you banned guns over there. A lot less people would get shot. They would all be knifed instead. But stabbing someone with a knife is harder than shooting someone with a gun. You should amend the whichever amendment it is that allows you to carry guns.

Chigago did that before, and crime went up, not down.
 
Top