They like boycotts, so go ahead.Is giving 'Neg-reps' to fellow posters you disagree with the same as a 'boycott?'
I'll help ya.
They like boycotts, so go ahead.Is giving 'Neg-reps' to fellow posters you disagree with the same as a 'boycott?'
I'd slap him silly.
Why is that, when Hogg still gets to use it???????????
Y'all are fawning all over him for it.
Then why are you bringing him up????
He has been.
How many other teens do you idolize for using foul language?
I have more thanks than posts. For some people, it's quality over quantity.
He wouldn't be talking like that if he was.Good thing he's not your kid.
He probably has a ANITFA black hoodie and mask at home in his pajama drawer.
I'd slap him silly.
From children.Some 'types' enjoy hearing foul words and jokes.
They like boycotts, so go ahead.
I'll help ya.
He wouldn't be talking like that if he was.
And he would darn sure know about gun safety.
And he would be grounded for being such a bully.
From children.
But, you know, the slogan of the left is to let 'em rip!
You're reading it wrong, pal.
The little twit has accused everyone that opposes his view as being a child murderer.
He's just a little puppet mouthpiece for the leftist rhetoric of bumper sticker cliches.
Naw, I don't think so. Sponsors try to stay away from ANY bad press.
Yeah, but playing dirty isn't 'more intelligent' in my book.
Perhaps I can give you 'some' outsmarting for the kid, but that isn't what I tend to call intelligence.
I'd suggest the kid and Laura may not be wise.
She didn't cause his college rejections
but he certainly isn't 'smarter' for it, just because he caused some of her sponsor problems
He wouldn't be talking like that if he was.
And he would darn sure know about gun safety.
And he would be grounded for being such a bully.
Yes he was.He wasn't whining about it though.