Knight's POTD 12-3-2007c

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nathon Detroit

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
3 POTD's in one day!!!!

It's a trinity of Posts of the Day!!!

MD wrote: The open view answer is more elegant on this issue.
The OV at least attempts to answer the question of the existence of evil/suffering. They will claim that for God to interfere, then our free will will be harmed. While problematic, it is still an answer.

The SV'ers need another level of excuse. If everything is God's will, then evil too is God's will. To explain this, they appeal to mystery (God's unknown reasons or plan), which is not an answer at all.
I don't like the term "closed view" or "free" will.
"Closed" is not meant to be a slight. It is useful to contrast it to the open view, which is not apparent when using AMR's "classical" terminology.
All men are willful, but none of them are "free".
So is God coercing your every thought?

One either serves the devil or one serves God.
A useless false dilemma.
:first:
 

Nathon Detroit

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Notice how Nang (the settled viewer's) arguments can so easily be demonstrated as being in error even by a non-believer like the Mighty Duck.
 
Last edited:

Nick M

Plymouth Colonist
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
I gave him so positive rep in that exchange, but not that post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top