In the case of Philomena,
it was a hatchet job on the church
and
completely misrepresents the all the good that has been done
even if
the story was true
In the case of Philomena,
You obviously have had little interaction with adoptees. The terms used are birth parents and adoptive parents to differentiate between the two. Calling one set of parents 'real' is an insult to both.
Also, orphans are children whose birth parents are deceased. I am also curious if you are aware that some dioceses were more diligent in checking the true nature of prospective parents than others. It is not unheard of for the church to give children to abusers, alcoholics, or women having a hard time getting over a miscarriage to 'placate' her instead of actually helping her.
I gave you three choices
and
now I will give you the answer
finding homes for orphans is the most important
that was easy
So any home as long as the parents are straight and catholic? Regardless of what kind of parents and what kind of homelife they provide?
it was a hatchet job on the church
and
completely misrepresents the all the good that has been done
even if
the story was true
The story is true. And what a sad story it is.
You see no meaning in blood ties, in ancestry, in biology????
you want horrors
who has done more
when it comes to placing orphans in good homes?
and
they were forced out of business because they would not accept same sex couples
so what does this tell you?
accepting same sex couples is more important than placing orphans in good homes
and
that says it all
It doesn't. But concerning the future, third party reproduction should be heavily regulated, for the protection of children's rights.How would any of these make a child less worthy of protection?
It doesn't.
How would any of these make a child less worthy of protection?
It doesn't. But concerning the future, third party reproduction should be heavily regulated, for the protection of children's rights.
so why do you keep bringing it up?
You cut off the most important part of the post! Wow. :doh:so why do you keep bringing it up?
Those practices should be discouraged and much of it stopped altogether. Unless you just really don't care about children's rights. I for one, do.Good question.
So adults can do whatever the heck they wish with reproduction and children's lives , so long as the government makes sure to put in place protections? Got it.How would any of these make a child less worthy of protection?
you mean playing politics and promoting discrimination is more important than placing orphans in good homes
well get over it
and
you will have no trouble finding that kind of stuff
if
that is what you are looking for
Those practices should be discouraged and much of it stopped altogether..
Unless you just really don't care about children's rights. I for one, do.
You pretend to care about them as a way to further your agenda.
what is his agenda?
Anti-gay, pro-patriarchy (he used material from such a site on ACW's thread), anti-woman.