This comment from Todah provokes a response from me, "Or she arranged the timing and her route with the PP employee, who was obviously lying as the videotape clearly showed." The tape neither proves nor disproves (imo), because the cameras range (on top of the old fire training facility), does not show the lot entrance of PP. * If PP would have presented the tape from the camera at the entrance gate, we would have more of a view of what really
happened.
However, the footage from this camera is only presented when it serves PP purposes it seems. When the video evidence stands against them, PP lawyers make arguments that the cameras video evidence was lost or recorded over. This has happened before and it sounds like it has happened again. Also, I am reminded that there is a sign at the lot entrance which reads, your conversation is being recorded. Never have I heard this evidence being released.
So although it might be an undertaking to record everything, it seems that it should be, so that we avoid the suspicious loss of tapes and who said what recordings. Back to the opener, it does seems to come down too - when you cause others grief by what you say, it can be held against you, especially when you are fighting against an abortion provider who pumps money into the local economy and political system. Jo and Ken should appeal as far as they can and sue for damages caused by PP not releasing all the evidence and the Court for stepping on free speech.
