The contention is that you are a cultist which I believe has already been proved. I don't believe there is any infatuation only frustration at your inability to not see truth.
Where has the above in yellow been proved?
You say "I don't believe there is any infatuation only frustration at your inability to not see truth", what are you talking about, WonderfulLordJesus showed me nothing in relation to trying to attempt me to show truth, all he did is copy and paste 24 scriptures, how could quoting scriptures which I do not deny existing and me highlighting he gave no reasoning in relation how they reveal "the truth" lead anyone to frustration? In fact could you even show me a single time you or anyone else has showed me "truth" and I've ignored it with no good reason as to why?
You like many others merely assert that you are correct, assert people such as myself have the "inability to not see truth" and yet can never really show how. Imagine if I said to you that you have "inability to not see truth", does me making such an assertion make it any more credible or true, no. So it's very naive of you to make such a claim when you yourself know such a claim proves nothing. Let's do a thought experiment, let's imagine I was 100% correct with my understanding of the bible and Trinitarians were unknowingly wrong with their understanding, would Trinitarians still be saying things such as "you have the inability to not see truth" when they couldn't get through my reasoning, yes of course they would! So either if you are 100% right or 100% wrong such a statement is still simply stupid to make as one would still make such a statement in either case. I'm the one trying to be reasonable with others here, at no point do I show an attitude where I disregard another's interpretation, I always reasoning things out, people such as yourself and WonderfulLordJesus refuse with no good reason other than make un-proved assertions that I have the "inability to not see truth" when such a thing has never been proven or demonstrated.