Rosenritter
New member
Who does the Judging is irrelevant to this conversation.
No it is entirely relevant. God is the judge, that's the context of the Psalm that you admit Jesus invoked in response to their charge.
Who does the Judging is irrelevant to this conversation.
Lol, "notoriously" according to who? Trinitarian scholarship of course. But since you are not even a Trinitarian you are merely piggybacking on their error because it supports your own privately held theory. Elohim is not a man. Elohim is non-corporeal SPIRIT. No one has seen or beheld Elohim at any time: just as the authors of the Apostolic writings have stated in two places in the scripture, (in support of the Torah and full Tanach O/T teaching on the matter).
All of the people in heaven are called elohiym (gods.) All of the people on earth who will have life immortal are also called elohiym (gods.)No it is entirely relevant. God is the judge, that's the context of the Psalm that you admit Jesus invoked in response to their charge.
The ORIGINAL BIBLE TEXT says that God (Yahwah) is the ONLY Divine Eternal. The word (God) is an interpretation in place of the translation "divine."
The Trinity proof text have been found to be Pagan corruptions of the bible scriptures. The same is true about the word "Hell." Trinitarianism and Hell are Pagan beliefs adapted to the bible. As for me, I view such things as a sin to tamper with the bible scriptures.
Trinitarianism in Judaism is a sin punishable by death. Trinitarianism has never been a belief in Judaism. Trinitarianism was introduced into Christianity by Gnostic Pagans.
Joshua 22:22
“The One Mighty God, Yahwah! The One Mighty God, Yahwah! He knows! And let Israel know! If this has been in rebellion or disobedience to Yahwah, do not spare us this day.
Psalm 50:1
A psalm of Asaph. The One Mighty God, Yahwah, speaks and summons the earth from the rising of the sun to where it sets.
Malachi 2:10
Do we not all have one Father ? Did not one God create us? Why do we profane the covenant of our ancestors by being unfaithful to one another?
Malachi 2:15
Has not the one God made you? You belong to him in body and spirit. And what does the one God seek? Godly offspring. So be on your guard, and do not be unfaithful to the wife of your youth.
Romans 3:30
since there is only one God, who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through that same faith.
1 Corinthians 8:6
yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Messiah Yashua, for whom all things came and through whom we live.
Ephesians 4:6
one God and Father of all, who is over all, and through all, and in all.
1 Timothy 2:5
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Messiah Yashua,…
James 2:19
You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.
Is it God's right and perogative, to become a God more powerful than Himself? Can God become a righteous evil God? How about a truthful liar or an all knowing ignoramus? An omnipotent impotent? An all powerful, powerless one? If God has the right and perogative to become and do anything, can God become Satan? Again I ask, can an all powerful God, create another God, more powerful than Himself?
The point is, that God can't do certain things. He doesn't have the right, prerogative, power, to undermine and violate His own nature and character.
John 1:1
Greek:
en arche en ho logos kai ho logos en pros ton theon kai theos en ho logos
Interlinear:
en (in) arche (beginning) en (was) ho (the) logos (Word) kai (and) ho (the) logos (Word) en (was) pos (toward or with) ton (TON is a special definite article "the" meaning the one and only, it appears as TON instead of O in the Greek) theon (Divine Eternal) kai (and) theos (Divine) en (was) ho (the) logos (Word)
In English we have:
In beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the (one or only) Divine Eternal, and Divine was the Word.
The defining article "a" must be supplied for the English language, to define that there is another Divine that is not the "Divine Eternal."
Why do translators drop off the definite article TON (the one or only) before Divine Eternal?
Theon and Theos
They both mean Divine, but in different cases. Theos is the nominative, Theon is accusative. Another form is Theou, which is genitive.
John 1:1 reads: “In [the] beginning was the Word, and the Word was with [τὸν θεὸν, (TON THEON) literally, the only Divine Eternal], and the Word was divine. [θεὸς].”
In the first instance (“the Word was with the only Divine Eternal”) it is in the accusative case and thus is spelled θεὸν [theon] But in the second occurrence it is in the nominative case, and so it is spelled θεὸς [theos]
Ton Theon was also applied to Zeus, meaning "The Only Divine Eternal."
The Trinity proof text have been found to be Pagan corruptions of the bible scriptures. The same is true about the word "Hell." Trinitarianism and Hell are Pagan beliefs adapted to the bible. As for me, I view such things as a sin to tamper with the bible scriptures.
You do realize that you shoot your own argument in its foot by accusing me of having Trinitarian bias, while at the same time acknowledging I am not Trinitarian?
Nope.
Alexandrian > Roman|Byzantine
I meant Alexandrian not Roman. Byzantine > Alexandrian. Alexandrian is notoriously corrupt.
You are a gossip. Show where I speak about the avatar of others, you false witness.
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?115654-The-Trinity&p=5079938&viewfull=1#post5079938
Be silent now, lady. One who herself uses a game avatar of a make-believe deity.
AMR
You are a galactic hero, according to you, and your picture is feminine.
Jesus is that one God and Father.
God can do anything that He wants, and He chose to come to earth as a Son of Man.
Yours is a Dungeons and Dragons fantasy deity that has been used since the 1980s being held up by you as a representation of the armor of God (Er, no!).
AMR
You claim yours is mere picture of someone wearing the armor of God, when in fact is is a picture of a fantasy deity that has nothing to do with God or God's armor:His screen name is the name of a galactic hero, according to his own guidelines about screen names it makes him a galactic hero. I think that makes him delusional, and that he is a hypocrite and can't see it.
As for my avatar, it is someone with the full amour of God. I chose this picture because of that probably over 15 years ago before so many others started using it.
Jesus came, the Father didn't.
You claim yours is mere picture of someone wearing the armor of God, when in fact is is a picture of a fantasy deity that has nothing to do with God or God's armor:
https://alchetron.com/Heironeous-2942423-W
Clearly you rationalize your use "before so many others" in the face of facts to the contrary.
Lady, you are becoming quite an spectacle of hypocrisy.
AMR
Think what you want.
I got that picture from the Internet with the scripture on it Eph 6:10-17.
More hypocrisy.I couldn't care any less what you think of me.