NWL
Active member
NWL said:can the alpha and omega die?He can. He is God come down from heaven to dwell among us. He can, and He did.
I hope you see the stupidity in your response, there are two things God cannot do, he cannot die nor lie, you just stated he can which shows your level of biblical knowledge.
You have admitted God is not eternal since he can die, therefore you unwittingly deny every verse which states God is eternal which in turn means you worship an un-almighty God who is able to perish just as man can.
NWL said:can the first and the last die? No.Yes, and yes again. He said He did, and was raised bodily from the dead.
Again you deny that God is eternal! An eternal God cannot die, you can't see the illogical inconsistency in your belief system. I'm sure if I ask "Is God eternal" you would answer yes, but at the same time you also say "God can die".
glorydaz said:He always was and always will be. Did He stop being God when He took on the form of a burning bush? Or a pillar of cloud?
God wasn't at the burning bush, he had an angel acting as his representative which was clearly clarified to us in the NT (Acts 7:30).
It's a question you can't answer, because you deny Jesus Christ is God come in the flesh.
Isaiah 9:6
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
What makes you think I can't answer? I fully know in what sense Jesus is the F&L, why give you solid food when you're struggling to drink milk.
Isaiah is not proof Jesus is God being part of a trinity, look at the context of Isaiah 9:6, firstly it states "his name will be called", can I say regarding Queen Elizabeth of the GB that she will be called the Queen of England if she already IS the Queen of England? No, such a statement wouldn't make sense unless she wasn't the queen of England and I'm making a reference to her future. Likewise stating Jesus "will be called" implies he isn't what he one day "will" be called.
Furthermore the trinity doctrine teaches Jesus is NOT the Father but that all persons of the trinity are three distinct and separate persons, if that is true, then explain why Isaiah 9:6 states Jesus IS the Father to me?
Irrefutable? That's a giveaway ...showing you have it fixed solidly in your mind that Jesus cannot be God. Don't tell me...you're a JW, aren't you?
Well, let's try actually reading what the text says. Check out all the and's. There isn't just the one separating the ONE from HIS throne, and the Jesus Christ as you would hope to slide through.
Revelation 1:4-5
4 John to the seven churches which are in Asia: Grace be unto you, and peace, from him which is, and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven Spirits which are before his throne; 5 And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,
Nope, verses 4 and 5 are quite clear. John is speaking for the ONE, and for the Seven Spirits that are before HIS THRONE. He is the that ONE from Gen. to Revelation. Jesus Christ is the entire list you see there. The First and the Last, the faithful witness...from Him and unto Him.
Haha! Where else in scripture do we find Jesus as the seven spirits? Scripture please. More than one persons sits on the throne, we see the Father, by right sits on the throne but allows other persons to also occupy it, Jesus stated "To the one who conquers I will grant to sit down with me on my throne, just as I conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne." (Revelation 3:21). Also there is more than one person before his throne, this includes angels and elders (rev 5:6)
Your explanation of Rev 1:4,5 is wrong. Jesus being “the Faithful Witness” (Rev 3:14), “the firstborn from the dead” (Col 1:18), and “the Ruler of the kings of the earth" (1 Timothy 6:15) are epithets of Jesus and can all be linked to where he is referred to those things in other scripture. This is completely lacking with with "the seven spirits" or “the One who is and who was and who is coming" which shows they aren't epithets but rather referring to unique persons. We can also see this when looking at the Greek, John uses the word "apo" (from) when referring to “the One who is and who was and who is coming", again with "the seven spirits" and again with "Jesus" but not when stating the epithets of Jesus in v5, which again, shows that all the things mentioned in v4,5 weren't merely ephitets of one being who sits on the throne. The things mentioned about Jesus after v5 relate only to Jesus and not the first two person(s) mentioned in v4.
You also contradict yourself when you say Jesus is that one who sits on the throne, if that is the case then how does he takes the scroll out of the hand of that one sitting on that throne if he "is" the one sitting on the throne!?
(Revelation 5:1) "..And I saw in the right hand of the One seated on the throne a scroll... And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice: “Who is worthy to open the scroll and break its seals? But one of the elders said to me: “Stop weeping. Look! The Lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David, has conquered so as to open the scroll and its seven seals... And I saw standing in the midst of the throne... a lamb that seemed to have been slaughtered...At once he came forward and took it out of the right hand of the One seated on the throne.."