That's why we need more conceal/carry states.Americans own guns for self defence. Why don't they shoot when some lunatic goes on a killing rampage? Because owning guns does not keep anyone safe when the element of surprise is there. A gun kept in the closet at home is useless when your ambushed by a crazed murderer.
That's why we need more conceal/carry states.
Americans own guns for self defence. Why don't they shoot when some lunatic goes on a killing rampage? Because owning guns does not keep anyone safe when the element of surprise is there. A gun kept in the closet at home is useless when your ambushed by a crazed murderer.
Americans own guns for self defence. Why don't they shoot when some lunatic goes on a killing rampage? Because owning guns does not keep anyone safe when the element of surprise is there. A gun kept in the closet at home is useless when your ambushed by a crazed murderer.
It's like 100-to-1 the ratio of American civilians who carry a gun most of the time, compared with those who don't. Most of the time, there's nobody with a gun to shoot back. When someone shoots back, it's frequently LE off-duty.Americans own guns for self defence. Why don't they shoot when some lunatic goes on a killing rampage?
Practice.Because owning guns does not keep anyone safe when the element of surprise is there. A gun kept in the closet at home is useless when your ambushed by a crazed murderer.
You're able to hope much harder that you'll never be a victim, if you don't keep or bear a gun, it's been proven, shown scientifically to be true, just fall in line.Does NOT owning a gun in that situation make it any safer? I guess maybe I shouldn't respond, but in what situation does not owning a gun make an attack safer for a potential victim?
Hope harder :chuckle:You're able to hope much harder that you'll never be a victim, if you don't keep or bear a gun, it's been proven, shown scientifically to be true, just fall in line.
Americans own guns for self defence. Why don't they shoot when some lunatic goes on a killing rampage? Because owning guns does not keep anyone safe when the element of surprise is there. A gun kept in the closet at home is useless when your ambushed by a crazed murderer.
Fewer are caught in that "element of surprise" than they were during more peaceful times. Back in the old west, people packed guns, and were ready to use them at the drop of a hat. One never knew when an Indian would pop up from behind a bush.
We're seeing more people with concealed carry keeping these killers at bay...or taking them out before too much harm can be done. We need to see more of it.
Americans own guns for self defence. Why don't they shoot when some lunatic goes on a killing rampage? Because owning guns does not keep anyone safe when the element of surprise is there. A gun kept in the closet at home is useless when your ambushed by a crazed murderer.
Americans own guns for self defence. Why don't they shoot when some lunatic goes on a killing rampage? Because owning guns does not keep anyone safe when the element of surprise is there. A gun kept in the closet at home is useless when your ambushed by a crazed murderer.
Americans own guns for self defence. Why don't they shoot when some lunatic goes on a killing rampage? Because owning guns does not keep anyone safe when the element of surprise is there. A gun kept in the closet at home is useless when your ambushed by a crazed murderer.
They actually have, google it. Every school should hire ex-police as teachers able to carry concealed too.
Yep, just like when the death penalty was measured swiftly and the community was there to witness it, it was a deterrent to crime.
The Wild West is the the American founding myth. At least for some Americans.