Islam strikes again....body count at 77 as of 8:10 PM Central

[commonsense]

You pathetic idiot. Empathizing will not stop islam. You shut the hell up and let others deal with it. January can't get here fast enough. You are worried about me knowing it is muslims, rather than the muslims themselves.

Actually if you've been following this story you'd know the killer was not religious at all. His own father says he didn't attend mosque, observe Ramadan, he drank alcohol, did drugs, ate pork. He was just a loser sociopath dick with financial and marital problems. Obviously many of these incidents are by sick Islamists freaks.

 

[Nick M]

BEIRUT (AP) -- An Islamic State-run media outlet says the man who barreled his truck into a crowd in the French coastal city of Nice is a "soldier" of the group.

The Aamaq news agency on Saturday cited a "security source" as saying the attacker "carried out the operation in response to calls to target the citizens of coalition countries fighting the Islamic State."

The statement did not name the attacker, and the language implied that he may have acted independently. There is no evidence IS was involved in planning the July 14 attack.

The attack killed 84 people and wounded 200. The driver was identified as Mohamed Bouhlel, a Tunisian deliveryman known to authorities as a petty criminal.​

 

[commonsense]

BEIRUT (AP) -- An Islamic State-run media outlet says the man who barreled his truck into a crowd in the French coastal city of Nice is a "soldier" of the group.

The Aamaq news agency on Saturday cited a "security source" as saying the attacker "carried out the operation in response to calls to target the citizens of coalition countries fighting the Islamic State."

The statement did not name the attacker, and the language implied that he may have acted independently. There is no evidence IS was involved in planning the July 14 attack.

The attack killed 84 people and wounded 200. The driver was identified as Mohamed Bouhlel, a Tunisian deliveryman known to authorities as a petty criminal.​

Yes ISIS is trying to take credit for the slaughter.....like 24 hours later. Nick M don't believe every thing ISIS tells you, they're not trustworthy...:duh:

 

[gcthomas]

Puerile tripe. Can't fight something you're not willing to honestly name as what it actually is -- as what ITS OWN ADHERENTS TELL YOU IT IS -- much less destroy at its source.



Stop right there. More puerility. Embracing your way of life, as prior generations in the U.S. and Europe did to fight mortal threats, is the key. But if you don't believe the society you live in is worth fighting for, you will never be convinced to do so. So don't pretend your on the same side here. People like you will still insist we're wrong for doing what must be done FOR YOU as well as for ourselves. You are a cowardly, lying ingrate.

Both the US and UK have a long history of accepting and absorbing immigrants — how is doing the exact opposite embracing the American (or British) way of life?

 

[gcthomas]

Option one is utter hogwash, because societal inequities have nothing to do with radical islam's ideology.

Since most islamic people don't become terrorists, what is the triggering factor? Most of the terrorists seem to have been petty criminals previously, and most petty criminals come from economically deprived areas.

What makes you so convinced that economic factors are not part of the problem?

 

[musterion]

Both the US and UK have a long history of accepting and absorbing immigrants — how is doing the exact opposite embracing the American (or British) way of life?

That is a deliberately narrow depiction, therefore false.

Immigration was not indiscriminate and unrestricted, as it is now under people like you. Borders were defended and standards for access strictly maintained. Signs of communicable disease could be enough to get someone turned away at Ellis Island. So could being a known anarchist. That's no longer the case with the Left in charge of Europe and the United States. It WAS unthinkable to allow in anyone unwilling to assimilate into the respective societies, or indeed working to supplant them, or who bore diseases eradicated or unknown in the new lands.

That is no longer the case but apparently you have no problem with it.

 

[Nihilo]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_terrorist_attacks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Hindu_terrorist_attacks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Buddhist_terrorist_attacks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks

One of these links, is not like the others.

 

[Catholic Crusader]

Both the US and UK have a long history of accepting and absorbing immigrants — how is doing the exact opposite embracing the American (or British) way of life?

I'd say because Islam is unique in that Sharia is not compatible with our tradition of liberty.

Most immigrants in the past were Christians (and some Jews). Others, like Asians, were not of any radical belief system that stopped them from integrating. Islam is different.

 

[musterion]

Leftist are reluctant to acknowledge the existence of taqiyya because they have a natural affinity for traitorous fifth columnists. It's how they arrived at the power they now possess. Taqiyya is fifth column Mohammed style, so they're sympathetic to it.

 

[Catholic Crusader]

Taqiyya shooters are awesome. Oh, wait... ..nevermind.

 

[musterion]

Photoshop a Koran under this guy's arm, darken his skin a little, and the Left would hang this up tomorrow.

 

[Catholic Crusader]

 

[Catholic Crusader]

Obama's America

 

[musterion]

 

[gcthomas]

I'd say because Islam is unique in that Sharia is not compatible with our tradition of liberty.

Most immigrants in the past were Christians (and some Jews). Others, like Asians, were not of any radical belief system that stopped them from integrating. Islam is different.

So Christianity is thoroughly compatible with the tradition of liberty? You're OK with abortion laws, gay marriages, extramarital sex and all that sort of stuff? Do Muslims have the liberty to live their private lives according to whatever religious law they wish to subscribe to, just like Christians?

You've had Muslims in the US since the 17th century, and you bought many Muslims as slaves, It is a bit late to claim that they don't have the same religious liberty as the rest of you.

Or is liberty realy only for WASPs?