-
This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
Is volcanism and the earth's surface radioactivity evidence of the Flood? yes or no.
- Thread starter Idolater
- Start date
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
How am I to score a field goal if you change the goal post?
Ya got me kickin' the wrong direction.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Whose gravity, what gravity, where the hell did I gravitate?
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Hydroelectric power?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Also tidal
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Birds of a feather (masses) flock together.
Last edited:
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
No.
If gravity was the cause of the force water has to turn the turbines, it wouldn't matter how low the water got.
But this is not the case...
https://www.hcn.org/articles/hydrop...dams?msclkid=2648ff42c02b11eca374a0c21ffdfa03
Yet dry times still do impact hydropower production because the lower the reservoir, the less force the water has to turn the turbines. Lake Mead’s “dead pool” — the level at which it could no longer turn the turbines — was once 1,050 feet, about 25 feet below what it is now (and a level that is not in the cards at least for a few more years). But new wide-head turbines have been installed over the last decade, which lowers dead pool to about 950 feet, thus extending Hoover’s hydropower life for a while.
Last edited:
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
No.
If gravity was a force generated by mass attracting mass there would be no possible way for the smaller moon to reach through the larger earth's gravitational force and yank the earth upwards.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Was it bacon? I think it was bacon. I remember thinking about bacon. Could we make it about bacon? Let's make it about bacon.So.... This thread was about something...
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Or maybe the folks who thought gravity might help their position could now admit that bacon ain't flying here today.
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
What proposition exactly do you think your link proves or supports? That gravity isn't involved in hydroelectric power? I didn't see that in the link.
Why did you make this bold? The lower the reservoir's level the lower the pressure at the bottom of it.
That sounds like good news. What is your point? How is this evidence against gravity, or against gravity being a force?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Right Divider
Body part
Before the flood... the earth's crust was almost entirely bacon.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
"If gravity was the cause of the force water has to turn the turbines, it wouldn't matter how low the water got."
How do you figure that? A water column 33 feet tall exerts a 14.7 PSI pressure at its bottom. Double the column height, double the pressure at the bottom. Higher the pressure, faster those turbines spin. Lower the pressure, maybe the turbine won't spin at all.
How do you figure that? A water column 33 feet tall exerts a 14.7 PSI pressure at its bottom. Double the column height, double the pressure at the bottom. Higher the pressure, faster those turbines spin. Lower the pressure, maybe the turbine won't spin at all.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Try to stay on point.
Why does the devastation to the hydro plate theory, due to gravity not being a force, have you talkin' about the shape of the earth?
Last edited: