So, marital rape is rape. It's a legal and moral violation of another human being and it shouldn't be defended by anyone, within or outside of the Body.
That's sod parroting another bit of mine.
Anyway, I didn't have to. You did it when you couldn't rebut.
Your need to desperately project.
And you still have no argument as to why marital rape is permissible outside of your own gender-based bias.
And you still have no argument as to why marital rape is permissible outside of your own gender-based bias.
I have, over and over,
This. Also, his criticizing anyone on definition is just plain funny, given his problems on the point.Nope ... your arguments (which are grossly biased and based solely on gender) have no relevance in a law-abiding society that promotes freedom for ALL. No man or woman EVER have the right to force sex on another human being.
Sure it does. God willing it's rare, but just as God's beloved David managed at least one horrible mistake in his moral life, Christians are capable of serious moral lapses. And in the case of marital rape, where many actively attempt to deny culpability.... Now if you're arguing that a husband can't rape his wife, that taking her against her will isn't rape, you're just a garden variety idiot and that's that....doesn't exist in a Christian marriage
So, marital rape is rape. It's a legal and moral violation of another human being and it shouldn't be defended by anyone, within or outside of the Body.
Nope ... your arguments (which are grossly biased and based solely on gender) have no relevance in a law-abiding society that promotes freedom for ALL. No man or woman EVER have the right to force sex on another human being.
The law said something different not too long ago, as the law is relative
Indeed ... thank goodness the bad old days are behind us, and the law is equally representative towards ALL.
Hey, so long as it works for you
It does.
And that's why God gave women no authority over morals or leadership
Your response is not an acceptable defense for marital rape ... BTW, the *law* agrees with me. Not you.
Just thought I would remind of you of that.
It's not an argument. It's a statement of fact. She gave you the context in that very post. Speaking of actual logical fallacy:That is not an argument, that is an appeal to authority.
So what should you be saying to the mirror about now?You realize that appealing to history is a logical fallacy, unless the argument is over history. lain: Of course you don't. Well, add that to the list of things you need to study if you get into college.'Marital rape' is an oxymoron-that is why for all of history, including almost entirely the common era, it was never seen as a crime.
Learn logic, idiot
Your response is not an acceptable defense for marital rape ... BTW, the *law* agrees with me. Not you.
So what :idunno:
All you're saying is that people fell for feminism and agree with you.
Typical smug attitude of a defended woman.
So what ...
All am I saying is that ... I AM smug ... because ...
I. Am. Right.
You. Are. Wrong.
The. Law. ..................agrees with ME. Not you.
You can protest and kick and scream all you like, but at the end of the day, husbands will still be prosecuted IF they rape their wives.
@Rusha believes those who hold to this aren't real men-.
Now shut up