What happened to not being able to tell?
There is a double standard to that that is practiced by the cult-like types :chuckle:
What happened to not being able to tell?
That tells a lot about you and Heir.
Hey, I thought MADS don't get to inspect fruit.
Pot, kettle?
There is a double standard to that that is practiced by the cult-like types :chuckle:
So, I haven't been around much of late, so I'm wondering something. Am I to assume by "cult-like types" you're speaking of all the threads that have been out accusing MADs of being like a cult. Or are you simply implying that some MADs are out of line with your personal version of it? You being the non-cult like and they being the real "cult-like".
What? That we both recognize nonsensical statements?
You thought wrong....like most folks, we get to do whatever we want to. In fact, we are to judge all things....someone being a "dweeb" is just one of them.
Nice try, though. :thumb:
He's the kind of guy that abhors being doubted or even questioned about his beliefs. He's arrogant, malicious, argumentative, pretentious, and has a whiny kind of animosity against those he doesn't much care for. He holds a grudge and is extremely ill-tempered.
He used to hide it better.
"Hide" is the "Keyword."
Which is why I said the whitewash has chipped away.
So, I haven't been around much of late, so I'm wondering something. Am I to assume by "cult-like types" you're speaking of all the threads that have been out accusing MADs of being like a cult. Or are you simply implying that some MADs are out of line with your personal version of it? You being the non-cult like and they being the real "cult-like".
He's been referring to pretty much all MADs, with his own doctrine as the measuring rod to judge us with.
That's one perspective.Tam herself concluded it was anything but.
Danoh has his list of "Detestables:"
1) GM
2) Heir
3) Glorydaz
4) Musty
5) Etc.
PJ and I have an ongoing feud?Never mind Tam's ongoing feud with PJ and vice versa.
Really!Only number four?? What a gyp.
He's the kind of guy that abhors being doubted or even questioned about his beliefs. He's arrogant, malicious, argumentative, pretentious, and has a whiny kind of animosity against those he doesn't much care for. He holds a grudge and is extremely ill-tempered.
He's been referring to pretty much all MADs as cultic, with his own doctrine (Richard Jordan's, really) as the measuring rod to judge us with.
So, I haven't been around much of late, so I'm wondering something. Am I to assume by "cult-like types" you're speaking of all the threads that have been out accusing MADs of being like a cult. Or are you simply implying that some MADs are out of line with your personal version of it? You being the non-cult like and they being the real "cult-like".