Infractions for old posts?

[Eeset]

Squeaky just received an infraction for a reply made in February! That is a 4 month old reply! I am shocked.

I think there should be a time limit for handing out infractions. 24 hours seems about right.

 

[Tambora]

I think

Lord help us!

 

[Eeset]

A statute of limitations is needed.

 

[meshak]

A statute of limitations is needed.

I agree. That was too old post.

 

[musterion]

Did he bump it?

edit: looks like this might be what done it.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4362217&postcount=57

 

[The Berean]

A statute of limitations is needed.

I'm just curious, Esset. Have any of your "requests" or "improvement" ideas ever been implemented? :think:

 

[musterion]

I'm just curious, Esset. Have any of your "requests" or "improvement" ideas ever been implemented? :think:

Well, she once asked me to remove a tasteless smiley that made her upset, so I did. So there's that.

 

[Eeset]

I'm just curious, Esset. Have any of your "requests" or "improvement" ideas ever been implemented? :think:

Yes.

 

[Rusha]

Squeaky just received an infraction for a reply made in February! That is a 4 month old reply! I am shocked.

I think there should be a time limit for handing out infractions. 24 hours seems about right.

So when someone breaks the rules and it's not reported in a timely matter, it means there was no rule violation?

 

[Eeset]

So when someone breaks the rules and it's not reported in a timely matter, it means there was no rule violation?

When has that ever happened?

 

[chrysostom]

squeaky deserves every infraction he has ever gotten

have you noticed how he breaks up one extremely long post into four very long posts
and
gets away with it

 

[bybee]

Well, she once asked me to remove a tasteless smiley that made her upset, so I did. So there's that.

Good man!

 

[meshak]

squeaky deserves every infraction he has ever gotten

have you noticed how he breaks up one extremely long post into four very long posts
and
gets away with it

It is no surprise with this kind of comment. You are catholic. Squeaky is deeply spiritually minded. He is not a political Christian and your organization and you are deeply involved in politics.

just saying.

 

[This Charming Manc]

Does Chrys own the RRC?

I thought it was the unions that did?

It is no surprise with this kind of comment. You are catholic. Squeaky is deeply spiritually minded. He is not a political Christian and your organization and you are deeply involved in politics.

just saying.

 

[This Charming Manc]

Squeaky just received an infraction for a reply made in February! That is a 4 month old reply! I am shocked.

I think there should be a time limit for handing out infractions. 24 hours seems about right.

i think mods have 5 mins or we get away with it

 

[brinny]

...maybe some grace could be utilized in this kind of situation where the post is kinda' old?

'jus sayin'

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

A statute of limitations is needed.

Instead, how about a "limit of Statues?"

 

[The Berean]

Yes.

Which "request" or "improvements" were implemented?