Nineveh said:And sadly, I also know of some who try to justify child rapists.
Nineveh said:Beanie-adult,
Are you still missing these homos knew convicted child rapists were working with them? Are you still missing they not only didn't dismiss these non-threats to children, they requested others just ignore it and come to the event anyway? (That cost you guys gay pride week this year)
These two child rapists were welcomed and protected by leading homos. And now you are here justifying their actions. You aren't helping your cause any more than they did. But at least you are here to say it for yourself instead of having a teenage boy do it for you now.
Granite said:Would you favor executing female and juvenile sex offenders as well?
beanieboy said:They were setting up and tearing down the event.
Explain to me what children would be threatened.
Are you trying to be obtuse?
btw - pride still went on.
lovemeorhateme said:Rimi, I agree with you on the treatment of pedophiles. In fact, I couldn't agree more (the only alternative punishment is to chop their bits off.)
My question is this, and I am only asking out of curiosity. Do you advocate the death penalty for homosexuality? And if so, why so?
Rimi said:Yes.
beanieboy said:They were setting up and tearing down the event.
Explain to me what children would be threatened.
Are you trying to be obtuse?
btw - pride still went on.
beanieboy said:Do you think the 24 yr old female teacher that had an affair with a 14 yr old boy should be executed?
Many male posters seem to support the affair. It was kind of disturbing.
Nineveh said:Obviously you are failing to see where including and protecting child rapists is bad for your cause.
Or...
Maybe you just agree that child rapists in the homo community should "just be ignored".
beanieboy said:Do you think the 24 yr old female teacher that had an affair with a 14 yr old boy should be executed?
Many male posters seem to support the affair. It was kind of disturbing.
Nineveh said:So in your defense you are going to point to others who are just as wrong as you?
beanieboy said:I was pointing out that men support boys having sex with women.
When it is a 24 yr old man and a 14 yr old girl, is molestation.
It's a double standard.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21544&highlight=middle+schoolRimi said:Please direct to which thread in which you read "many male posters" approve of this molestation.
Rimi said:If that's how God wants it done, it's good enough for me.
beanieboy said:No. I think that one should protect children from molesters by not allowing them to be alone with children.
These men were setting up and taking down stages and tents.
Now - explain how this is a threat to children.
I would never wish molestation on any child, but former sex offenders get jobs, live in communities (where there is a warning sign), go to parades, baseball games, etc.
They don't wear a scarlet letter.
So, it is up to the parents to protect their kids.
Setting up and tearing down the event isn't a threat to children.
beanieboy said:I was pointing out that men support boys having sex with women.
When it is a 24 yr old man and a 14 yr old girl, is molestation.
It's a double standard.
Nineveh said:Why have them associate with your event at all? Explain why you would even want them around a pride event.
And they feel right at home taking up residence in a homo pride event. Doesn't that bother you at all?
What if one of those "non threats" got ahold of a homo's kid while helping out at the event? Would you blame the homo parent?
If you guys can't see the problem with child rapists being associated with your events, there is no one to blame but yourselves for your reputation.
beanieboy said:Your assumption is that the seek out child molesters.
That's false.
Does a child molester have a right to attend the event after he's done his time? Yes.
Sorry. That's the way the US works.
He can also go to the mall, go see Free Willy, go swimming in a public pool, and no one is going to do a background check.
If he wanted to work at Target, even if they knew about the offense, he could, because he wouldn't be alone with children. He could work at a mall, a grocery store, etc.
I keep asking and you keep avoiding -
how do you think he get groceries? New clothes?
Where does he live? Are there kids in his neighborhood.
He is out in public.
Now, answer:
Are children harmed in them setting up and tearing down the event?