Asked and answered for those willing to actually admit it, versus attempting to reduce the Gospel to an incantation as a litmus test for odd views:
Not one verse posted in your "explanation". You only tried to say it doesn't mean what it says.
Asked and answered for those willing to actually admit it, versus attempting to reduce the Gospel to an incantation as a litmus test for odd views:
E. W. Bullinger invented...Bullinger
E.W. Bullinger...John Nelson Darby....Darby...Darby and Bullinger ...Darbyites and Bullingerites
Darby and Bullinger.
Darby and Bullinger
Darby and Bullinger.
Darby and Bullinger
Darby and/or Bullinger
...Darby....Darby
Darby and Bullinger...Darby's and Bullinger's ...Darby and Bullinger.
John Nelson Darby/E. W. Bullinger
John Nelson Darby and E. W. Bullinger... Darby/Bullinger
E. W. Bullinger... Bullinger ...Bullinger's ...Bullinger
John Nelson Darby and E. W. Bullinger... Bullinger ...Darby and Bullinger...Darby and Bullinger.
Darby and Bullinger...Darby and Bullinger
John Nelson Darby/ E.W. Bullinger ...Darby & Bullinger
You need to be more like Tet, and get on board with "drive by media" disinformation campaign.
And you have yet to prove you ever actually learned the very basics of arriving at, and or communicating intended sense or meaning...through the proper reading and or use of words...by how they are used.
For the billionth time, define "Judaism".
Asked and answered for those willing to actually admit it, versus attempting to reduce the Gospel to an incantation as a litmus test for odd views:
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?119927-What-is-the-Gospel&p=4818476&viewfull=1#post4818476
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?119927-What-is-the-Gospel&p=4819150&viewfull=1#post4819150
One Gospel. Q.E.D.
AMR
There's always the chance that the 12 or even the 70 started well but drifted toward monarchism or miracle-Messiasm. Both of those show themselves before the Confession/Transfiguration, when the declaration by Jesus was so shocking that they didn't absorb it.
They are Tet quotes.
And you have yet to prove you ever actually learned the very basics of arriving at, and or communicating intended sense or meaning.
They're not even real quotes from me.
E. W. Bullinger invented...BullingerE.W. Bullinger...John Nelson Darby....Darby...Darby and Bullinger ...Darbyites and BullingeritesDarby and Bullinger.Darby and BullingerDarby and Bullinger.Darby and BullingerDarby and/or Bullinger
...Darby....DarbyI removed the forward slash so you can see the original post number, which appears when you quote somebody. Ignorant fool....
complete lack of acknowledgement that Israel split into two and God divorced 10/12 of all Israelites, and the making all Israelites Jews.
All Jews are Israelites, but not all Israelites are Jews.
The Jews were the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
The House of Israel included every tribe except Judah, Benjamin, and some Levites. (no Jews)
That's not what I am saying.
I am saying that Gentiles become Israel.
It was the fall of Israel in 750BC that made salvation available to the Gentiles.
They are. It is called purging, to keep the server working faster. Those are all one time posts of yours. Let me show you how, by changing the quote tag.
What makes you think I am talking to you? Imbecile....
If you're going to quote me (or anyone else) do it the correct way. That way people can see the context of the post.
And, the server will not slow down by doing so.
The Danohianic Principle seems rather vague. Can you be more specific?
If you're going to quote me (or anyone else) do it the correct way. That way people can see the context of the post.
And, the server will not slow down by doing so.
Want to see your own words, and the link,
Go ahead, you don't know how to quote....LOL
Go ahead, you don't know how to quote....LOL
Go ahead, you don't know how to quote....LOL