It is not deception, Nang.
It is the truth.
Let me repeat it.
You won't find a single MADist here that says they teach a different gospel to Jews than they teach to Gentiles.
ECT I finally found MAD in Scripture 1 Ti 6:20 "falsely so called knowledge"
- Thread starter dodge
- Start date
It is the truth.
Let me repeat it.
You won't find a single MADist here that says they teach a different gospel to Jews than they teach to Gentiles.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
You are only trying to deflect from the fact that you teach a truncated, dishonest, and heretical message to both Jew & Gentiles.
What MAD preaches is not the full and Everlasting Gospel of Jesus Christ.
You may preach fairly to all, but you do not preach all that both Jews & Gentiles need to hear for salvation.
So stop with your attempts at clever subterfuge . . .
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
:chuckle:
Right Divider
Body part
There are many gospels in the Bible, oh illiterate liar dodge.
dodge
New member
Only in your delusions errors, and lies.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Dodgeism is in error.
Right Divider
Body part
No, they're in the Bible. You should get a Bible a read them for yourself.
Here are two of the many:
- The gospel of the kingdom
- The gospel of the grace of God.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
It's all the same. RD'ism is in error.
dodge
New member
Things that are the same are the same even if YOU do not understand that they are the same.
Right Divider
Body part
:jump:
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
He stumped you!
And yet, that is exactly the principle you violate in your erroneous conclusions on Ephesians 2, etc - in your violation of the fact that "Things that are the same are the same even if YOU do not understand that they are the same."
You consistently commit dodge's own consistent error, elsewhere...
dodge just pointed out that principle by accident.
Like an outdated calendar getting a thing right by accident, every eleven years or so.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Yes, the Danohianic principle.
No - ACTUAL Mid-Acts Dispensationalism.
Paint it how you will, yours is the result of a hybrid or (cun) fusion of where Mid-Acts studies a thing out from with where the Acts 28ers do.
You were better off under Feldick. At least he does not deviate from what he has right.
In stark contrast, your E.C. Moore, Brackin, et al only proved their incompetence at approaching attempting to solve for a seemingly perplexing issue - when they decided the solution was to fuse together how Acts 9 and how the Acts 28ers approach attempting to sort out one thing or another.
Yours is not how such things are approached when attempting to solve for them.
Worse, you and your pals immediately take issue with having any of these things pointed out to you.
Yours set in your ways behaviour that ends you up looking like yours is only Cult-like behaviour.
Neither said closed mind, nor said behavior, nor said errors, are representative of Mid-Acts.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Send me a copy of the official handbook.
Your usual cop out.
All you are ignorantly affirming by that is that Scripture is any man's guess.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Thanks
Anytime :chuckle:
dodge
New member
lol, he is stumped and is UN-able UN-able to stump anyone but himself and the others caught in the same lies.