Right Divider
Body part
The best part... "You're probably seriously hurt and need medical attention... now go to sleep".
Huge UFO news!
- Thread starter User Name
- Start date
"Slowed down to 10% of the original video’s speed, we see the object perform a diagonal motion at sudden high velocity, starting from a stand still. The object is moving so fast that it jumps from frame to frame..."
www.uaptheory.com
/
We explain a fundamental theory on how UAPs (UFOs) actually work, how they fly & move and why they have the capabilities that we observe them to have.
www.uaptheory.com
Explanation, with commentary.
Ie, it's just another out-of-focus commercial airliner.
If it was just a commercial airliner, then the Navy pilots are utterly clueless and the radar data is false and no one in military or political leadership has any clue what they are talking about regarding this issue. It it was just a commercial airliner, then the Navy pilots who saw it with their own eyes are not just wrong, they are straight-up LYING to you about what they saw. For example, here is Chad Underwood--the Navy pilot who actually filmed the object, describing his observations:
Great. Do you have a rational objection?
Where is the radar data for this incident? Hint: You don't have them.
Great.
Do you have a rational objection?
Great.
Do you have a rational objection?
You do realize that looking at this object from that distance would be impossible, right?
Why do you think the video equipment had such difficulty?
Did you read your link?
| Interviewer: Because you were at a distance where you couldn’t make visual contact with your own eyes... Answer: Right |
Of course I did. Cmdr Fravor and Lt Cmdr Alex Dietrich both had their eyes on the object. Do you have a rational objection? No, you do not.
Last edited:
So they were lying when they said it was too far away to see with their own eyes?
And with that, you have officially proved that you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
“Lack of wings and lack of evident means of propulsion clearly rule out conventional aircraft and helicopters. Many are soundless, many move at such speeds and with such accelerations that they defy understanding in terms of present technology.” -- excerpt from 1968 congressional testimony by the late James McDonald, a leading atmospheric physicist and professor of meteorology at the University of Arizona.
According to former director of national intelligence John Ratcliffe, unidentified objects are engaging “in actions that are difficult to explain. Movements that are hard to replicate, that we don’t have the technology for, or are traveling at speeds that exceed the sound barrier without a sonic boom.” Asked about these encounters, Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) referred to “technology which is in a whole different sphere than anything we understand.”
Similarly, former President Obama stated that “there’s footage and records of objects in the skies, that we don’t know exactly what they are. We can’t explain how they moved.” Obama’s CIA director, John Brennan, went a step further, speculating that these mysterious craft might constitute “a different form of life.”
thehill.com
According to former director of national intelligence John Ratcliffe, unidentified objects are engaging “in actions that are difficult to explain. Movements that are hard to replicate, that we don’t have the technology for, or are traveling at speeds that exceed the sound barrier without a sonic boom.” Asked about these encounters, Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) referred to “technology which is in a whole different sphere than anything we understand.”
Similarly, former President Obama stated that “there’s footage and records of objects in the skies, that we don’t know exactly what they are. We can’t explain how they moved.” Obama’s CIA director, John Brennan, went a step further, speculating that these mysterious craft might constitute “a different form of life.”
UFOs are an intriguing science problem; Congress must act accordingly
Congress must continue to assert itself on an issue that begs for scientific investigation.
thehill.com
Right Divider
Body part
Super spud?
We were talking about the video you provided.
And this is very obviously not referring to the video.
The video shows an out-of-focus commercial airliner.
The pilot did not see it with his own eyes.
It didn't perform any maneuvers apart from flying at a constant velocity.
You don't have the radar data.
All you have is people talking about things they saw on other outings.
Yeah, Nephilim are a different form of life.
There is more than one case I'm discussing here. Do try to keep up.
No kidding. After the quote, I posted this: "--excerpt from 1968 congressional testimony by the late James McDonald, a leading atmospheric physicist and professor of meteorology at the University of Arizona." You didn't bother to thoroughly read or comprehend the post you replied to, and it was only 3 paragraphs long.
Sightings of craft demonstrating unexplainable technology go back to at least the 1940s.
Last edited:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Yep. That's so you can avoid scrutiny of any of them.
You post videos, insinuating that they are obviously alien, then when it is shown to be most likely just an out-of-focus commercial airliner, you jump to a separate incident with no video, just a witness' account.
