TIPlatypus
New member
A lot of things I should imagine. I'm not really a creationist or an evolutionist, so I don't really mind.
Truster:
How is the OP not relevant to the OP?
Am I answering the right question?
But you have to accept that people can disagree strongly with you, and still be good people.
NO! you don't!!!! :sibbie::IA: I DISAGREE!!!!
That's why I do not like discussing politics. Someone always says right wing is unchristian or left wing is unchristian.
I was wondering if we could perhaps come up with some structure to debates and arguments.
For example, posting only relevant things, not being anti-intellectual, not avoiding questions (i.e. saying, "But this is not relevant").
I also think that commentary on the Bible is a bit redundant. A prime example is when people say things like:
Genesis 1:1 says, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Therefore God created time.
Any further suggestions?
It would make things so much easier.
I think the worst crime around here is hyperbole. It's murder. lain:O dear. Just some things are really annoying. People who say something means the opposite of what it does, or paraphrasing when it is not necessary. These are the worst crimes on here.
I was wondering if we could perhaps come up with some structure to debates and arguments.
For example, posting only relevant things, not being anti-intellectual, not avoiding questions (i.e. saying, "But this is not relevant").
I also think that commentary on the Bible is a bit redundant. A prime example is when people say things like:
Genesis 1:1 says, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Therefore God created time.
Any further suggestions?
It would make things so much easier.
At least we should decide some things which are good ways of arguing and some ways which are bad.