There isn't a Calvinist alive that would agree that they "reject Romans 5", as Nick M put it.
You don't have to convince me that the gospel (and the whole rest of the Bible for that matter) contradicts Calvinism at nearly every point. What I don't see is how you've made an argument. Perhaps you have and I'm not following the line of reasoning but I guess what I'm asking is this...
What's to keep b57 from quoting Romans 5 and giving it a Calvinist twist the same way Calvinists do Deuteronomy 30:19, for example?
Resting in Him,
Clete