Right Divider
Body part
Tet simply will not accept that fact that God does different things at different times with different people.Your Preterism belief system is a mess. You need to embrace
the Grace Gospel. (Paul's Gospel)
Tet simply will not accept that fact that God does different things at different times with different people.Your Preterism belief system is a mess. You need to embrace
the Grace Gospel. (Paul's Gospel)
Tet simply will not accept that fact that God does different things at different times with different people.
Oh, that's right, you think that all believers are now "spiritual Israel".
No, in the body of Christ there is no such thing.
What I don't accept is denying the New Covenant and claiming God still has a plan for the Jews.
That is blasphemous to everything Christ Jesus and the Apostle Paul taught.
Walk in the Spirit and you will not carry out the desires of the flesh, for he who has suffered in the flesh has ceased from sin. Pursue peace with all men and holiness without which no one will see the Lord. Like the holy one we are to be holy in all, all, all our conduct.
The wrong things the sinful self does are clear: being sexually unfaithful, not being pure, taking part in sexual sins, 20 worshiping gods, doing witchcraft, hating, making trouble, being jealous, being angry, being selfish, making people angry with each other, causing divisions among people, 21 feeling envy, being drunk, having wild and wasteful parties, and doing other things like these. I warn you now as I warned you before: Those who do these things will not inherit God’s kingdom. Gal 5
Sin disqualifies us from inheriting the kingdom of God. Do not be deceived that those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. We are to put to death the deeds of the flesh by the Spirit of God. The fruit of the Spirit is not tongues, healings, and prophecy; the fruit of the Spirit is:
But the Spirit produces the fruit of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control. There is no law that says these things are wrong. 24 Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified their own sinful selves. Gal 5
Paul taught that God will restore Israel, you sorry little loser.What I don't accept is denying the New Covenant and claiming God still has a plan for the Jews.
That is blasphemous to everything Christ Jesus and the Apostle Paul taught.
Paul taught that God will restore Israel, you sorry little loser.
Or maybe that restoration happened in 70 AD
Yes, but that does not make them "spiritual Israel".Are those who have faith in Christ Jesus the children of Abraham?
Yes, but that does not make them "spiritual Israel".
Not all of Abraham's children were Israel, even in the flesh.
Oh so confused one. You claimed that the OT went on until 70AD. And the OT included sacrifices for sin. How does that work again?If you understood the difference between Israel and Judah you wouldn't be so confused.
30AD
When Christ Jesus implemented the New Covenant with His shed blood, the House of Israel was joined together with the House of Judah. Just like Ezekiel and Jeremiah said.
In the flesh only, of course. You're so slow that everything must be explained to you.Are the Jews today who reject Christ Jesus the children of Abraham?
How can the OT and the NT run concurrently?
In the flesh only, of course.
The writer of Hebrews makes it clear that both covenants were in place at the same time:
(Heb 8:13) By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear.
Secondly,
If you understood David's tent, you would know how.
For 40 years David's tabernacle stood while Moses' tabernacle stood.
The Ark of the Covenant was in David's tent.
The Israelites and GENTILES worshiped God at David's tent, but at the same time the High Priest, the priests, and Levites performed all their priestly duties such as animal sacrifices at Moses' tabernacle.
That was a shadow of what would happenfrom 30AD to 70AD (also 40 years).
It's also why James said the following:
(Acts 15:16) "'After this I will return and rebuild David's fallen tent. Its ruins I will rebuild, and I will restore it,
James quoted Amos because the prophecy was fulfilled.
So this is heaven ? No more tears ?
Your incorrect understanding of Hebrews 8:13 leads you into this ERROR.The writer of Hebrews makes it clear that both covenants were in place at the same time:
(Heb 8:13) By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear.
Another excellent example of someone building a giant pile of poo based on their WRONG and CONTRIVED "understanding".Secondly,
If you understood David's tent, you would know how.
For 40 years David's tabernacle stood while Moses' tabernacle stood.
The Ark of the Covenant was in David's tent.
The Israelites and GENTILES worshiped God at David's tent, but at the same time the High Priest, the priests, and Levites performed all their priestly duties such as animal sacrifices at Moses' tabernacle.
That was a shadow of what would happenfrom 30AD to 70AD (also 40 years).
It's also why James said the following:
(Acts 15:16) "'After this I will return and rebuild David's fallen tent. Its ruins I will rebuild, and I will restore it,
James quoted Amos because the prophecy was fulfilled.
This why Paul can quote from the SAME OT passage as the writer of Hebrews and show that is was STILL future at that time.
Another excellent example of someone building a giant pile of poo based on their WRONG and CONTRIVED "understanding".
Absolute nonsense (as usual).Once again Dispensationalists show they have very little understanding of scripture.
The only reason any NT writer ever quoted an OT prophecy was to show that the prophecy was being fulfilled, or had been fulfilled.
Once again, oh so stupid one, Paul is simply say that this prophecy will be fulfilled (just like all prophecy). And he made it clear that the fulfillment is YET future.Not one NT writer EVER quoted an OT prophecy for the purpose of re-prophesying.
Show us that this what Paul meant. You can't because he didn't.This is by far one of the biggest blunders Dispensationalists make. Dispensationalists constantly take OT prophecies and apply them to the yet future (even when they aren't quoted in the NT), but especially when they are quoted in the NT as being fulfilled.