blackbirdking
New member
My understanding of election is based primarily on 3 bible commentaries I use for my bible study (Luther's commentary, Matthew Henry's commentary and Jamieson,Fausset,Brown commentary). Luther was of course Lutheran, Henry was Presbyterian and Jamieson,Fausset,Brown was a mixture of Presbyterian and Anglican authors. I lean more towards Luther's understanding of election.
You believe election is determined by God; He chooses.
What does that tell us about His character? What kind of God is He?
The whole question of election is about the sovereignty of God. If you follow your presuppositions to the end, you go into hyper-Calvinism. That's one thing Luther struggled with, and he tried to avoid the end conclusion by claiming it was non of our business. He may have been right except that, if God wants to send me to hell, fine; but that tells me something about His character. He calls that good. Then He says I should treat others good; really? Love my enemies the way He does? The world sees enough of that from religion.
Your doctrine causes God to be the responsible party for all sin.
The whole definition of good is...