Right Divider
Body part
Sorry, yes.Sorry, no.
The methods all use similar unknown and unknowable assumptions. Therefore, their agreement is meaningless.The chance that there would be agreement by chance alone is tiny. And, when we have multiple occurrence of agreement, it is virtually impossible.
That is good.The Mississippi flows at rate that can be measured.
Wow... what a revelation!We can estimate how far a body can drift over a particular period of time and find the body on this basis.
All of that is observable.This is a gross example. But, we do not need to know where and how the water flow started.
You are ignorant of conditions that can accelerate decay a BILLION fold.Isotope decay is infinitely more predictable than a river.
No, it is not.It is as reliable as gravity.
You are confused.Then, we cannot establish ANYTHING in physics. How did gravity start?