elohiym
Well-known member
Shame on me ...
Yes, and you are reaping that shame now.
Shame on me ...
I was talking about him helping her to change into bedclothes and disposing of underwear. There was no sex on 24th (or whatever day it was.)
You love to make judgments before both sides can present their evidence.
Right now he is going to trial, not prison. Calm down.
Yes, and you are reaping that shame now.
His reputation and career has already been ruined and his wife taken from him in a horrible way. Get outraged.
No she doesn't. The facts are already out in the media. People can read the court documents, the affidavit by the agent, the family statement, etc.
His reputation and career has already been ruined and his wife taken from him in a horrible way. Get outraged.
I believe you're right. This is more like rape.
:thumb: Exactly.
Yes, well, this is absolutely revolting.
You love to make judgments before both sides can present their evidence.
:think:
Why didn't you say that to those posters, Shagster? :think:
We don't need a court system, we have detectives elohiym and 1peacemaker already.
:think:
Why didn't you say that to those posters, Shagster? :think:
You love to make judgments....
How do you know the media has all the facts?
We don't need a court system, we have detectives elohiym and 1peacemaker already.
However, if we could accurately know who is guilty and innocent before they go to trial we wouldn't need a court system, would we?
You are thinking of Rusha. I am pleading with others to respect the elderly and withhold judgment.
He didn't need to. Know why? Because ...
shagster01 said:We don't need a court system, we have detectives elohiym and 1peacemaker already.
They didn't start the thread.
Only you don't believe that when the court rules that a vaccine caused autism. Then you don't believe the court. Got it. :chuckle:
They didn't start the thread.
You love to make judgments before both sides can present their evidence.
They just read the daily news.....
....and swear by every word
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other...able-to-consent-to-sex/ar-AAawO2C?ocid=HPCDHP
Seems from this developing court case, in some states if you want to be able to continue possessing the right to have sex as an older person, you might have to get cooperation from the medical community. But...
What if you wrote a living will, that, in case of senility, you still consent to sex with your partner unless you orally withdraw that consent?
Yes should still mean yes even if you are old.
I think people should try to protect that right.
People should think it's wonderful that those two elderly love birds still have passion, and it's probably what keeps Donna alive in that cold place. What will happen now - now that her soul mate is taken from her? Why must he spend his last years on earth rotting behind bars for doing what he and his love have always done willingly and joyfully?
I don't believe that I know more than medical professionals.
Why is it that you don't believe the accused rapist's confession? He admitted to sexual activity.
Why is his confession not enough for you? :think:
I don't believe that I know more than medical professionals.
I KNOW you don't know more than medical professionals.
During his marriage.Why is it that you don't believe the accused rapist's confession? He admitted to sexual activity.
Why is his confession not enough for you? :think:
Oh. I must have you confused with the person who included a news article when he/she created this thread.
That wasn't you?