Hollywood pedophiles

[musterion]

Do you agree with Jesus that Love the Lord your God with all your heart and mind and Love your neighbor as yourself, are the two highest commandments?

If you do, you can see that faggot isn’t a nice word. I wouldn’t want to be called faggot. Would you? If you don’t care, please feel free to tell me.

Are you okay when black people affectionately call each other "******" but are offended [or pretend to be] when they hear any non-black person use the word in any context?

 

[Grip Docility]

Are you okay when black people affectionately call each other "******" but are offended [or pretend to be] when they hear any non-black person use the word in any context?

I served in the service and find words to be dependent on intention. If a word is used to condescendingly express a negative perception of someone or something, it bad.

Jesus would agree with this principle and James chapter two is very clear about how to treat people.

If you call me ni..er or faggot and you are being kind to me, without attempting to belittle me as a person, it’s okay. But if you claim superiority towards me and use the word to deride me and shame me, as a human being, you become a person that has no ability to bridal your tongue and would be disqualified from teaching others Bible matters, by the Bible.

If you desire to call me faggot, queer or n....r, I only ask that you don’t mind being called the exact thing.

Thank you, Mustaggot , or Musterion?

 

[musterion]

I served in the service and find words to be dependent on intention. If a word is used to condescendingly express a negative perception of someone or something, it bad.

So if faggot is used simply as another word for homosexual (fewer letters to type) with no judgmental component, it should not be a problem. Same with queer...they call each other that, it's actually a label of pride now. Stop pretending to be offended.

Jesus would agree with this principle and James chapter two is very clear about how to treat people.

Christ called people vipers and whited tombs. Paul called people stupid. Peter called people fools.

Thank you, Mustaggot , or Musterion?

Your words are empty.

 

[patrick jane]

Hello faggot,

I changed my mind and agree with you that it’s just a word.

Fag lover

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Interesting how not one TOL'er has come forward in a thread about pedophilia to denounce Eeset, who as shown several pages back wants to do away with age of consent laws.
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?127186-Hollywood-pedophiles/page17&p=5132415#post5132415

Telling...

 

[annabenedetti]

So you persist in discord anyway? Don't lie, you're loving these endless arguments you keep going with endless questions and objections, never accepting the truth because you simply don't want to. That's not why you're here. Troll.

Takes two to tango. You're right in the thick of this and you're berating someone else for being there too? Classic...

 

[annabenedetti]

Are you okay when black people affectionately call each other "******" but are offended [or pretend to be] when they hear any non-black person use the word in any context?

"in any context?" The only context would be if there's an agreement between them as friends. Otherwise it's theirs to use amongst themselves but it's not yours to use because your historic usage would be as vindictively racist as the history of the word has always been.

What's a 'gospel of grace' kinda guy doing looking for some societal acceptance for you to use a word that you know is offensive? What kind of 'grace' are you tapping into there?

 

[annabenedetti]

I've been here for a few years. The other Old Timers may like me or not but I'm a known quantity.

You're part of a group that can say what you want and know you'll never be banned for it or blocked from a thread.

The only ones I know of who claim to have a problem with my integrity are leftists like yourself and a few cultists, all of whose opinions can be discounted as worthless.

Most likely those who know you lie to achieve your troll-hunting merit badge, in your mission to cleanse the board of those who don't agree with you.

Now you are a known quantity too. You're a hypocrite for judging people by a standard you don't even believe, and a troll for repeatedly trying to provoke people over things you don't believe.

Translation: musterion is provoked, therefore, musterion declares troll.

 

[annabenedetti]

I’m no leftist. I noted that a poster here was offended by a word and remember my mother forbid the use of that word. How is that wrong to bring up when people are flossing over the biblical point of not offending their brother?

Certain people here enjoy saying the word because they know it's offensive to people on "the left," and they're so immersed in their enjoyment of it at TOL that they forget there are other people who aren't on "the left" who find it offensive also. The simple fact that you find the word offensive automatically makes you suspect, and assumed to be on "the left," even if you're not.

 

[annabenedetti]

The offense is in the intent. You use the word to express hatred and contempt making it (and you)offensive.

^This.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by Grip Docility
The picture for the user Eeset was the give away. The cynicism was apparent the second I saw the words and user picture together.

She sexualized everything,
It was just her thing.
She rarely posts here anymore, so talking about her is pretty moot at this point.

So talking about a lifetime member of TOL who on two different threads condoned pedophilia is "moot at this point"?

And, of course, most of us already know that ACW exaggerates and spins things quite often to cause a ruckus.

i.e. it's that darn anti Trump Christian aCW who is the problem here, not someone who in two different TOL threads condoned adult-child sex.

You can say something sarcastic to him or use a pun, and he will start hollering ...... "But you SAID it!"
It's his thing.

:carryon:

Child rape is a huge part of the LGBTQ lifestyle and agenda. Being that Eeset was a defender of homosexuality and the 'gay' agenda while she actively posted on TOL, do you have any evidence to show that her words promoting adults raping children were "sarcastic" or "a pun"?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by patrick jane
I believe that you think that some children "enjoy" having sex with adults,

I believe some do enjoy it.
I've seen some teenage girls that are just sluts and want to screw anyone in sight no matter what age they are.
Same with some teenage boys.

I would agree that adults should be more responsible than a teenager.
But we mustn't deem the teenagers as having no responsibility in every case.

According to statutory rape laws, the child doesn't have responsibility.

Statutory rape laws are based on the premise that until a person reaches a certain age, that individual is legally incapable of consenting to sexual intercourse. Thus, the law assumes, even if he or she willingly engages in sexual intercourse, the sex is not consensual.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape

Should statutory rape laws be amended so that an adult who has sex with a child who he or she perceived "wanted it" (through a verbal exchange), or as you and Peter Tatchell said "enjoy it", not be as severely penalized as an adult who has sex with an 'unwilling' child?

 

[Grip Docility]

Fag lover

He who has been forgiven much, loves much. He who has been forgiven little, loves little. Your comment has a sense of humor to it. It is reminiscent of the ku-klux-klan calling people n....r Lover.

If I feigned that I believed homosexuality is a disease that is contagious, I would be afraid of your comment. If I was ashamed of Jesus loving and forgiving me, while I was still a sinner, I would speak as you do.

Either you are in the closet and looking for a companion, or you are a Christian that has been peer pressured into pointing out the flesh to gain acceptance by others. Are you ashamed of the gospel?

 

[Grip Docility]

Originally Posted by Grip Docility
The picture for the user Eeset was the give away. The cynicism was apparent the second I saw the words and user picture together.

So talking about a lifetime member of TOL who on two different threads condoned pedophilia is "moot at this point"?

i.e. it's that darn anti Trump Christian aCW who is the problem here, not someone who in two different TOL threads condoned adult-child sex.

Child rape is a huge part of the LGBTQ lifestyle and agenda. Being that Eeset was a defender of homosexuality and the 'gay' agenda while she actively posted on TOL, do you have any evidence to show that her words promoting adults raping children were "sarcastic" or "a pun"?

Has it occurred to you that the Westboro Baptist Church, the most Christ like church ever, kidding, has a home for your unusual fixation on homosexuality.

Unfortunately, there is no color, sexual orientation, monetary background or typical factor that identifies people that sexually harms children.

Trump is a man and not a god. Who cares what a figure head does? You need to focus on today. You seem to be a man driven by obsession and with enormous force! Your excellent brain is being compromised by your inability to move past chemically induced focus on one topic.

Jimmy Swagert tried with all his might to attract pornographers and prostitutes with his every sermon. What’s in your trunk?

 

[Grip Docility]

Originally Posted by patrick jane
I believe that you think that some children "enjoy" having sex with adults,



According to statutory rape laws, the child doesn't have responsibility.

Statutory rape laws are based on the premise that until a person reaches a certain age, that individual is legally incapable of consenting to sexual intercourse. Thus, the law assumes, even if he or she willingly engages in sexual intercourse, the sex is not consensual.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape

Should statutory rape laws be amended so that an adult who has sex with a child who he or she perceived "wanted it" (through a verbal exchange), or as you and Peter Tatchell said "enjoy it", not be as severely penalized as an adult who has sex with an 'unwilling' child?

No matter what a person believes or fights for, there isn’t one person I’ve talked with here that appears to want statutory rape laws repealed.

The most controversial thing said was biblical. Parents need to hold their 14 years and up children accountable for their choices and behaviors. The person that suggested that, doesn’t advocate rape, child molestation or child endangerment.

Why are you so focused on gays and pedophilic behavior? You would help a lot more if you took up with law enforcement. Have you considered doing something to help the cause you believe in that transcends talking?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Child rape is a huge part of the LGBTQ lifestyle and agenda. Being that Eeset was a defender of homosexuality and the 'gay' agenda while she actively posted on TOL, do you have any evidence to show that her words promoting adults raping children were "sarcastic" or "a pun"?

Has it occurred to you that the Westboro Baptist Church, the most Christ like church ever, kidding, has a home for your unusual fixation on homosexuality.

I wouldn't be a good congregant as unlike those at the WBC, I'm not an inbred, plus I believe in forgiveness via repentance.

Unfortunately, there is no color, sexual orientation, monetary background or typical factor that identifies people that sexually harms children.

After you've responded to my post questioning your statement about lust in my WHMBR! Part 4 thread (and thanks again for having the courage to come into the thread), I'll gladly talk about the long long history of pedophilia/pederasty amongst homosexuals and the LGBTQ movement.

Trump is a man and not a god.

And the congregation in unison said "Duh".

Who cares what a figure head does?

Obviously the people (and I use the word "people" loosely) who elected him.

You need to focus on today. You seem to be a man driven by obsession and with enormous force! Your excellent brain is being compromised by your inability to move past chemically induced focus on one topic.

Jimmy Swagert tried with all his might to attract pornographers and prostitutes with his every sermon. What’s in your trunk?

A love of God and decency. Kinda "queer" isn't it?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Should statutory rape laws be amended so that an adult who has sex with a child who he or she perceived "wanted it" (through a verbal exchange), or as you and Peter Tatchell said "enjoy it", not be as severely penalized as an adult who has sex with an 'unwilling' child?

No matter what a person believes or fights for, there isn’t one person I’ve talked with here that appears to want statutory rape laws repealed.

To my knowledge other TOL'ers are capable of defending themselves, i.e. they didn't elect you as their spokesperson.

The most controversial thing said was biblical. Parents need to hold their 14 years and up children accountable for their choices and behaviors.

Parents holding their children up to biblical standards has absolutely nothing to do with statutory rape laws.

Why are you so focused on gays and pedophilic behavior?

If someone is going to defend it, someone has to speak out against it.

I look forward to that topic being discussed in my WHMBR! Part 4 thread.

You will be returning won't you?

 

[Grip Docility]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Child rape is a huge part of the LGBTQ lifestyle and agenda. Being that Eeset was a defender of homosexuality and the 'gay' agenda while she actively posted on TOL, do you have any evidence to show that her words promoting adults raping children were "sarcastic" or "a pun"?



I wouldn't be a good congregant as unlike those at the WBC, I'm not an inbred, plus I believe in forgiveness via repentance.



After you've responded to my post questioning your statement about lust in my WHMBR! Part 4 thread (and thanks again for having the courage to come into the thread), I'll gladly talk about the long long history of pedophilia/pederasty amongst homosexuals and the LGBTQ movement.



And the congregation in unison said "Duh".



Obviously the people (and I use the word "people" loosely) who elected him.



A love of God and decency. Kinda "queer" isn't it?

You don’t waffle back and forth in your ideals. You advocate repentance and forgiveness.

I wonder, what would you say, if you were charged for a year, to share the gospel with incarcerated pedophiles and homosexuals? Would you accept the charge?

 

[Grip Docility]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Should statutory rape laws be amended so that an adult who has sex with a child who he or she perceived "wanted it" (through a verbal exchange), or as you and Peter Tatchell said "enjoy it", not be as severely penalized as an adult who has sex with an 'unwilling' child?



To my knowledge other TOL'ers are capable of defending themselves, i.e. they didn't elect you as their spokesperson.



Parents holding their children up to biblical standards has absolutely nothing to do with statutory rape laws.



If someone is going to defend it, someone has to speak out against it.

I look forward to that topic being discussed in my WHMBR! Part 4 thread.

You will be returning won't you?

I will return if you are okay with me being there. You have curated it meticulously and I have no intentions of messing it up with foolish words.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

You don’t waffle back and forth in your ideals. You advocate repentance and forgiveness...

as well as a just criminal justice system.

I wonder, what would you say, if you were charged for a year, to share the gospel with incarcerated pedophiles and homosexuals? Would you accept the charge?

Wait, are you saying that those who engage in homosexual behavior should be incarcerated? But but but, you've shown yourself to be a sexual anarchist in other posts by stating that you don't believe that homosexuality should be recriminalized.

Where do you stand ole sexual anarchist on this subject?