Grosnick Marowbe 3
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
neg repping has bothered me a lot
and
I would like to see it discussed more
we are supposed to love even our enemies
and
giving neg reps is not the way to do it
and
I would like to see it discussed more
we are supposed to love even our enemies
and
giving neg reps is not the way to do it
I may have to post on town's thread
if
he keeps posting on the other one
if
he keeps posting on the other one
I do believe grosnick is not happy about this new thread
I have no doubt that he is 88
and
what gives you reason to doubt him?
and
are there others who do?
Yes, it is should be discussed because it is so unchristian behavior and this is Christian forum.
They are also boasting the they are true and saved Christians.
thanks for bringing it up
God bless you for that.
He will be very upset when he he reads this.
why do you say that?
we have to bump this thread
Because you are treating him like he is senial (sp). I dont think anyone like it if it is not true.
It seems to me he is very clever or slick denying the truth.
Cm, GM likes your "new concept" of the old thread. It's absolutely ingenious...You're a truly brilliant man. I'm very sad to admit, I've totally given up on TH. His writing style seems, incoherent and strange. Anyway, I can't make, "heads nor tales" of it!! I think it best to simply dismiss his opinions (if that's what they are??) and cease to communicate with him, from now on...
I take offence to what you just said...I totally deny being, "cleaver or slick."
Wile E. Coyote
New member
And still another "diatribe" from wile...Wonders never cease...
Yay!
I'm :first:
ROFL!
I agree. However, NickM has always been in the "neg rep" business...
Not necessarily, no.
Not unless they say something unChrisitian in the rep, no.
I doubt everyone who neg reps you is a Christian.
What, you think they're hiding the fact? :chuckle:
I'd say a neg rep, absent untoward language, is a form of objection at best and a petty slight at worst. But I can't help noticing that your consideration is a bit one sided. When you have a number of established members from very different views neg repping you (especially those who aren't known for the practice) the greater likelihood is that you've done something to merit it. It's at least worth considering.
And yet you keep people on ignore. Heck, you put me there just for disagreeing with you about love and long before I'd ever given you a neg rep for the whole thread with my name on it.
lain:So a person should be allowed to be as rude as they like so long as they're new? :AMR: And how do you mean weak or strong. Chrys has the most rep power around here. Is he being a bully by giving a neg rep to anyone else?
How would it be cowardly if you can see who it is and they're the same people you have on ignore for publicly challenging you before you...hide from them.
Brave Sir Robin indeed.Then you should stop doing it.
lain: You don't love a child by letting it throw food in a restaurant. But again, you should stop doing it if you feel that way.
I mostly don't care for it so I mostly don't do it.
:yawn: Like you, apparently, I have no idea what you're talking about. :idunno:
EDIT: apparently you mean the other thread by the same name. Like I said there, you should definitely close that one and complete the lame Gros defense that technically meets the charge but fails on principle.
So it's much like Gros or you in response then. :think: Touche.